English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,311894,00.html

3 black kids break into a white guys house to steal his prescription drugs, beat his step son with a baseball bat (so badly that he has brain damage and now lives in a treatment facility) and when 2 of them end up shot and dead and the 3rd charged with murder they have the audacity to cry RACISM!

sorry, i think that if you break into someone’s house you had better be ready to eat a FACE FULL OF LEAD. who’s with me?

2007-11-16 01:14:27 · 18 answers · asked by Free Radical 5 in Politics & Government Politics

18 answers

Set aside the bogus allegations of racism for a moment.

I'm more concerned with how the state is applying this "Provocative Act" doctrine. How can one perp be responsible for the deaths of the other two if all three went willingly to commit the same crime? They are essentially absolving responsibility from the two dead robbers by applying this statute, which was originally put in place in the event an INNOCENT victim, not an abetting accomplice, was killed while a crime was committed.

2007-11-16 01:49:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Nevermind the racism, the law is whats wrong with this case. The man was defending his home and his son, even though i decry a death of any person, if he was in fear of his and his son's and there was no other option available i would have to back the homeowner. But prosecuting hughes for something someone else did is absurd.

This story doesn't give the reactions of the families of those who were killed. So how do they feel who, if anybody should be prosecuted for this. Hughes will surely be put away for a long time for assaulting the son so badly.

2007-11-16 01:47:03 · answer #2 · answered by eorpach_agus_eireannach 5 · 2 0

A. I would like to hear both sides of this story before I make any conclusions.
B. If, for once, Fox News is telling the complete truth, than It is no racism but simple law, when you break into someones house you assume the risk of everything that goes with that including the possible death of your accomplices. That is not racism that is simple, and excuse the pun, black and white justice.

2007-11-16 01:30:53 · answer #3 · answered by White Star 4 · 2 0

I agree with you 100%. It makes no difference what color your skin is. If you have the nerve to break into a persons home and then proceed to beat them, then you better be ready and open to the possibilities of what could be waiting for you on the other side of that door.

2007-11-16 01:25:57 · answer #4 · answered by snowcell77@rogers.com 2 · 4 0

Whenever the naacp or aclu gets involved in anything, it turns to mushy brain syndrome. Rev amos brown should mind his own business.

My next door neighbor was robbed at gunpoint at 1pm in the afternoon by a black man. Then subsequently, my house was broken into while I was at work. I would not hesitate to shoot anyone regardless of skin color for violating my turf.

Home invasions should come with the death penalty.

2007-11-16 01:43:00 · answer #5 · answered by WhereTheBuffaloRoam 5 · 1 1

while Vargas became scuffling with he became not allowed to even have Gatorade in his nook. And that's authentic that there is a few overall performance enhancers which at the instant are not detected interior the effortless attempt the combatants bypass by way of. What helped Margarito take those pictures for see you later became the undeniable fact that he looked approximately 20 lbs over the load cut back. He could have dehydrated previous to the weigh in to make weight then placed the water back in him over nighttime. Very unsportsman like. They truthfully had 2 bottles in his nook, a water bottle and yet another bottle, so what became in the different bottle. people have each and every desirable to indicate that out and ask questions. Vargas could not have Gatorade so what the hell became in Margarito's 2nd bottle? there have been a lot of combatants that have been taking enhancers and have not examined valuable and have been merely found out by using fact somebody ratted them out. those pictures weren't annoying?? yea i assume Margaritos face became smashing around like that by using fact he likes to pass bang. for sure you have not considered Cotto combat in the previous. and that i did see the combat two times ,the punches could be devastating in the event that they have been landing on a welterweight yet Margarito became middleweight. i will see now why adult adult males does not combat him, by using fact he's not a welterweight. I provide Margarito credit for procuring the win, notwithstanding that's going to likely be tainted for me by using load difficulty. Ive considered Margarito interior the hoop in the previous yet as quickly as I considered him and Cotto at the same time i became taken aback at how he dwarfed Cotto. And all and sundry whos been around boxing long sufficient might desire to look at Margarito and tell he became far greater than 147, he became greater like one hundred sixty five to a hundred and seventy. identity opt for to be certain Margarito step up in weight, abandon the welterweight and combat at middleweight, see how he deals with adult adult males his very own length and larger. he's not lots approximately style

2016-09-29 08:40:54 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

With you completely. Had it been the other way around, it would have been called a hate crime. Break into my house, you face the music, plain and simple. If the dogs don't get you first, someone will!

2007-11-16 01:20:53 · answer #7 · answered by Lisa T (Stop BSL) 6 · 4 0

If you're a criminal, you're a criminal. Skin tone plays no role.

I think the law is a good fit, because even if all 3 did agree, the survivor is still just as responsible.

2007-11-16 02:13:44 · answer #8 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 1 0

There comes a time when the Race Card simply does not work.. THIS IS ONE ONE THOSE TIMES!!!

2007-11-16 07:21:01 · answer #9 · answered by Shinji 5 · 0 0

The scumbags left his son incapable of living independently -- even feeding himself.

The greatest shame is that the homeowner didn't kill them all.

2007-11-16 01:19:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers