Then the liberals could have Rosie or Michael Moore host the RNC debates.
My opinion is that it would be far more entertaining.
2007-11-16 00:21:44 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
EDIT* I meant GOP, its early, sorry...
2007-11-16 00:22:27 · update #1
That would definitely be a hoot...but I don't think I could stomach Rosie and Michael Moore, would need a punching bag.
2007-11-16 00:27:39 · answer #1 · answered by elaine 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I would like to see Hannity host it.
As for Rosie or Michael Moore. I can just hear the arguments going on now. Nothing would be done and nothing would be settled. Rosie would ask a question about going into the war under false pretense, an answer comes up, and then she will go off calling them cowards and talking about the "Christian zealots". Michael Moore would ask about health care, get an answer and be discredited at the same time, and he would yell out, well why don't you sign your kids up for the military and send them off to war!
It would just be one big mud-slinging fest for those two. I would rather want to see a debate for the Democrats given by people with better credibility. I can't think of any now, but let someone else take it from here. But Rosie and Michael Moore are not the ones for the job. That would be a complete disaster and nothing would be accomplished.
2007-11-16 01:08:42 · answer #2 · answered by Fallen 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think that would be an excellent idea!
Watching limpbaugh and sean-boy perform their routines in front of an audience that isn't a bunch of sycophant lemmings would be a nice change!
Most conservatives are scared of rosie and moore, so I doubt their crowd would be anything they couldn't handle.
2007-11-16 12:08:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i could opt for to be certain those 2 host a Democrat standard debate. The Dems could in no way do it however by using fact they does not dare concern themselves to the not ordinary questions the way Republican applicants routinely do with the liberal press.
2016-09-29 08:38:45 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ooooooooooh... That is just wrong. hahahahaha!!!!
I think Robin Williams would be a little better than Michael or Rosie... At least he has a brain and can formulate a complete sentence on the spot.
2007-11-16 00:59:16 · answer #5 · answered by USMCstingray 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Rush or Hannity, that would be bad, because they would be asking republican question to democrats what the hell would that accomplish.
I could see it now they would ask the question, then answer it before any of the candidates, so they can lead the crazy people that listing to them.
These two are just like Joesph Gobbles, republican propaganda ministers!!!!!!!!!!
2007-11-16 00:45:28 · answer #6 · answered by man of ape 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If all these people are dropouts, I want to be one. These people are all successful, the rest of us, who followed the rules, are not nearly so successful.
What does that say about our wonderful department of Education?
I agree with you, it would be very entertaining, it might also be substantive.
All of these people are accomplished speakers, all of them would have opposing views to the candidates they were talking to, and it's likely that if this was the way things were done, we the people would have a much clearer choice.
2007-11-16 00:43:00 · answer #7 · answered by maryjellerson 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Let Dick Cheney do it. They would rip him a new one. I would pay to see that.
I would have Gore Videl host the RNC one.
2007-11-16 00:35:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would rather see Bill O'reilly do it, But Sean Hannity would be good too.
2007-11-16 01:18:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I'd like to see Michael Savage as the host.
If you're a regular listener to him, you'd know why too.
2007-11-16 01:00:46 · answer #10 · answered by GOD BLESS AMERICA/ANTI LIB 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋