2007-11-15 20:31:00 · 12 answers · asked by moderation 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
No, but it appears that John Edwards may have sealed his fate with all his personal attacks using hyperbole on Senator Clinton. I have never seen anybody booed so much at a primary debate before.
2007-11-15 21:41:24 · answer #1 · answered by Its Hero Dictatorship 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't think so, there's still plenty of time left until the Primaries start. Obama isn't among the great debaters of the nation either (although he isn't shabby), he's a much better at giving a speech to a crowd, and those are closer to the Primaries than the debates.
PS- Why do they always sit the Candidates who are behind off to the side? I don't appreciate that and I'm sure they don't. And if Barack or Edwards was standing there with his hand up I'm sure that they'd postpone a commercial break, which they didn't do for Richardson or the others a couple times...
2007-11-15 20:38:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Was there ever any doubt?
Did anyone really doubt that she would be President?
Amazing.
These debates aren't contests among competing performing dogs.
If there are those who still sit on the fence, they haven't done their homework.
It is WAY passed the time when adult voters should have their research done. The debates are just gravy, bub.
There has been plenty of time to check into each candidate; what have they said and done in the past, what were their votes in Congress. Did they make all the votes? If not, why not?
What have they written? What have they said for the past 10 years.
If you haven't made a decision by this time, you are just wasting our time and your vote.
Stay home and watch cartoons.
2007-11-16 07:01:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
There's a long way left to go in this thing.....it was said during the debate that Bush has a year and a 1/2 left in office.....and my heart just sank! It seems like his presidency has lasted FOREVER!! I cast my two votes against him and I would've voted 10000 times against him the 2nd time if they would have let me!
But as for last night I thought Obama and Edwards both hit some good points....and Kucinich skewered all of them pretty good for funding the war and flip flopping on key issues....which, for the life of me, I can't figure out why they do it....
2007-11-16 00:05:32 · answer #4 · answered by Ohio_Golfer34 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I completely agree. even nevertheless if Obama does get the nomination you wager you will see his pastor's comments all over the television from McCain supporters interior the final election. i think of it would provide him sufficient gasoline to a minimum of benefit particularly some the Independents and reason Obama to loose. enable's pray that Hillary gets it. I only heard right this moment that she has a sixteen factor lead over Obama in Pa!! She might only be waiting to get the final public vote everyday, (no longer the delegate) which must be sufficient to attraction to the super delegates into balloting for her!!!
2016-10-16 22:51:29 · answer #5 · answered by hammet 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it, even if it seems the media has already picked her as "the one."
The first 3 - 5 primaries are going to be critical for her. Iowa has a very complicated primary caucus process, and it is very possible she could lose it. After that, it depends on if the media labels her another "Howard Dean..."
For a really interesting look at how the Iowa caucus process works, and how Clinton could lose it, check the link in the source section.
2007-11-16 00:55:09 · answer #6 · answered by greenman_4thefuture 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Her latest showing was better this time, but she really did not do well in the previous debate. Depends on who saw which debate.
2007-11-15 20:35:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's face it.
Every time she spoke one got the impression that she knew what she was talking about, and that she was aware of the problems facing the next President.
Go Hillary!
2007-11-15 23:53:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She certainly overcame her little stumble last debate. Looks as if she's headed toward sealing that nomination.
2007-11-15 22:43:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, not with her debate performances, but with her very deep pockets.
2007-11-15 20:48:32 · answer #10 · answered by Dina W 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋