ie, is the neocon goal to build an actual stable democracy from which the US can withdraw and be proud, or is it to maintain a never ending millitary presence in a destabilzed country (if they're fighting amongst themselves, then they can't fight us).
2007-11-15
19:18:34
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
To the three responses so far to the effect "the surge is working". That was not my question. My question was what was the real plan back in 2001 and have they executed on it.
If we accept the assertion the surge is working that still does not address what the real goal is in iraq. (Bush has not defined what "winning" in iraq is, but that's a different problem).
I don't think the term neoconservative is a smoke screen--it is a label like any other for the core political philosophy the executive branch is excuting on.
2007-11-15
23:25:18 ·
update #1