I have a detailed list of people who claim they know what they are talking about yet even while the news has already been reported as fact they still say 0% of it happening.
Y/A was designed for people to ask real questions and get real answers. When a user breaks those rules, shouldn't also report them to keep this place sacred for the real people who care to talk about real issues? Shouldn't questions about peanut butter and jelly be banned? Shouldn't answers stating facts get thumbs up instead of 5 thumbs down?
If we can whine about baseball player's moral ground then why can't we uphold those same values here and stop being hipcrites? Who are we to judge when we do so little ourselves?
It's time to take this forum back from the "steriod users" and "greedy" ball players and give it back to the Derek Jeters and Craig Biggios of this forum. Who is with me?
2007-11-15 18:56:43 · 11 answers · asked by gosuleague 2 in Sports ➔ Baseball
There are a bunch of people just trying to be @ss holes, and we can't let that get under our skins. But I'm with you. People focus to much on the greedy people and steroid users (the negative) and not on the Biggios and Jeters (the postivie). If people don't agree with a persons answer, they put a down because there too stubborn to accept it. It's the internet, anything can happen.
2007-11-16 12:12:21 · answer #1 · answered by McMoose--RIPYAHS 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One) no longer all democrats help socialism, and that they are beginning sensible up that those persons who're democrats yet at the instant are not socialists will vote as a effect. 2) some democrats who've enable themselves be utilized by making use of people who've allowed our party to slip so some distance into socialism which you will no longer call a single element they help that socialists oppose or vice versa have finally gotten a backbone. 3) except some republicans lower back it, while it is shown to be socialism's fabulous fulfillment in the U. S., the Democrat party could have sealed that is destruction, or at very least (what i'm hoping), the top of socialism in the Democrat party. See, they choose scapegoats on the two factors of the political aisle, and the Republicans are not biting. it's time-honored. some on the two factors, deal for some votes, and then if there's a situation, neither party suffers too plenty. i became into thinking while that should ruin down.
2016-11-11 19:25:21 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I never pretend to be something that I ain't. If a celebrity has dirty laundry for all to see, well, that's too bad. It goes with the territory. And the one thing that many folks are offended by is the fact that the rich and famous get special treatment. So expect people to respond angrily to questions about controversial people.
And Yahoo Answers - due to it's open door policy - is far from sacred.
2007-11-15 22:22:19 · answer #3 · answered by Awesome Bill 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey, I agree that this gossiping crap could be tempered with a little real thoughtfulness. But don't be a Joe McCarthy, okay? Bust people on an individual basis by referring them back to their responses, but let's not make a police state here. There are those of us who have made efforts to post more positive questions and answers. Do that.
2007-11-16 04:49:11 · answer #4 · answered by Sarrafzedehkhoee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think in a forum- it's expected that some people are going to ask "silly questions" and give "silly answers." Apparently Yahoo Answers doesn't feel so strongly about keeping this forum entirely seriously- although you are free to write them. Yes i have found some posts- ridiculous and silly but i must admit silliness makes for good entertainment every now and again.
i think posts that are offensive, racial, vulgar, and hateful are the ones that need to be policed. Otherwise- let people have their fun...
That's my two cents,
Nickster
2007-11-15 20:04:19 · answer #5 · answered by Nickster 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe you should read you own question and select choice B) Shut The *BLEEP* Up. Leave the punishment up to the people who can actually punish. All you are doing is whining and complaining and worst of all.. drawing attention to yourself. Shouldn't people who whine about seeing questions that are not acceptable in their eyes be banned? Who is this fool? And who is he to call people out?
2007-11-15 21:46:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Where's the list?
.
2007-11-15 19:48:40 · answer #7 · answered by Kris 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There are some dumb people on here, and even dumber questions asked by those dumb ppl.
Let it go.
2007-11-16 00:06:33 · answer #8 · answered by bostonsportsfan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion people on this board should put up.
2007-11-15 19:30:38 · answer #9 · answered by Kuhan 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
wow, peanut butter and jelly banned, how un-american can you get.
2007-11-15 21:00:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋