English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you think the Chicago Bulls should trade Kirk Hinrich, Ben Gordon and Tyrus Thomas or Joakim Noah plus conditional 2009 1st round pick for Kobe Bryant. Bulls would still have Luol Deng and Ben Wallace along with Andres Nocioni. Do you think the Bulls have a really good shot at the title with Kobe on their side w/o Gordon or Hinrich?

2007-11-15 16:18:54 · 9 answers · asked by K Yo 5 in Sports Basketball

9 answers

No way, Kobe is a team killer. Look it at managements point of view, you can't believe a word he says, and if things aren't going well, he'll be whining to the media how he wants out.

2007-11-15 16:22:28 · answer #1 · answered by WestCoastin4Life 7 · 0 4

I"m a die hard Chicago Bulls fan, and the mention of trading for Kobe is insulting. The original trade was Kobe for Deng, Gordon,Thomas, and Noah I believe, you have got to be kidding me. Makes no sense to trade the the farm for one player. Look at the Timberwolves, they might have got younger and more athletic, but it's going to be a long rebounding process. Now as for the Bulls, the core of the team is awesome. Luol, Ben, Kirk, Thomas, Nocioni. Ben Wallace I disagreed with from the beginning. When you trade for Kobe you're sacrificing the concept of team ball for 35 points a game. Kobe was never a team player, and has no chance of learning to be a team player. I agree the Bulls need that one guy who can take over a game but not in the form of Bryant. In the offseason they should have traded Big Ben, Duhon, and Nociono for Paul Gasol, Now you have a player who can score, penetrate, and draw double teams that way the ball will kicked out to one of Chicago 3 point threats. Liek someone said earlier, kobe is a team killer, look what he did to the Lakers, just like the Bulls the Lakers could have won and won some more had Kobe kept his mouth shut and not been in competition with Shaq to be the man. For the record since the Shaq left, it's Shaq 1 Kobe 0

2007-11-16 02:19:45 · answer #2 · answered by J Truth 6 · 0 0

No, they're doing just fine without him:

1-6 with five more games on this West Coast road trip, a difficult home schedule in December, guys turning down extensions, Ben Wallace not rebounding.

Why in the world would they ever consider trading for Kobe?

2007-11-15 17:14:49 · answer #3 · answered by Lakewine 6 · 0 0

They would have a crack at the title since they still have the three players you mentioned (Deng, Wallace and Nocioni). But if the Bulls would trade their guards Gordon and Heinrich, who would they start at PG. If the trade would leave either of the two, then they will surely be a title contender.

2007-11-15 16:45:02 · answer #4 · answered by << jaguar >> 2 · 0 0

i'm a great time Laker fan, and in basic terms keen on Kobe's through fact he's a Laker (a minimum of at the instant). because it is going for any commerce of a commodity as Kobe, he could intestine the middle of your team. you're able to shop Heinrich, yet i think of you will lose merely approximately all people else. communicate approximately commencing over. this could particularly positioned Kobe decrease back right into a concern the place he's with mediocre expertise back, merely like right here in la. i do no longer know the way it may help him to get traded, through fact whereever he is going, he instructions this variety of value that key products could be long previous. contained concerning the Bulls, a youthful middle that has been enjoying mutually for this variety of long term could be broken up in desire of a million guy. the only benefit I see is that it may provide the Lakers the excellent factor approximately flexibility concerning dissimilar smaller salaries to commerce around as unfavourable to a million massive earnings. I do exactly no longer see that occuring. mutually as i individually like the products the Bulls could deliver to the Lakers, it does not help us, the Bulls, nor does it help Kobe. If he quite is that ticked off nevertheless, it particularly is inevitable no count how stupid the deal is for all in contact.

2016-10-02 11:33:02 · answer #5 · answered by gammons 4 · 0 0

i dont know if LA would take that deal. im pretty sure any deal with chicago has to involve deng. but kobe wont go to chicago if deng aint there. and if the trade went through i dont think a core of kobe, deng, wallace gets it done in the east.

2007-11-15 17:28:10 · answer #6 · answered by what? 7 · 0 0

Kobe is untradeable, yeah hes the greatest player in the league but you have to give up half your team to get him and by doing that you have no chance of winning anything

2007-11-15 16:49:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No way,No teams can afford Kobe.

2007-11-15 17:26:13 · answer #8 · answered by william 5 · 0 0

yes. even if its deng. we're talking about kobe here. i may not like kobe, but he's still kobe.

2007-11-15 16:42:30 · answer #9 · answered by m33p0 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers