You heretic! How dare you try to raise reasonable questions about the fine and lardenous work that our highly esteemed Democrat controlled Congress has worked so hard to oink up.
2007-11-15 14:23:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by spicymnguy 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
CNN is not MSNC and that's why CNN is the most trusted name in news, that's why they have the best political news on TV. What MSNBC did two weeks ago was not a debate, it was a set up to create a balance in the democratic field election, because Hillary was too strong leading the polls, but they failed because Hillary is still ahead ...
The MSNBC anchors don't have the same professionalism and experiences like the CNN ones, and that's why CNN is a biggest name than MSNBC when it comes to media in America.
Hope the MSNBC took note, because CNN shows them what is a real debate. When the candidates are going after each other by blasting each other are not gonna help the American people. So tonight, if someone is asking who won this debate, the answer is the public won the debate, because they really see where each candidate stand. And that's the way a presidential debate should be ...
In this debate, the republicans don't have what they had expected, their tactic is to stop Hillary to win the democratic nominee no matter how; like MSNBC have tried to do two weeks ago with their set-up. And because they don't receive this support from CNN, the most trusted names in news, they would say anything to blast the best political team on TV.
YOU GOT IT?
2007-11-15 23:23:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Van Basten 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did You really expect a hard question?? The evening was a look at Hillary event bought and paid for. The public should give up on CNN debates as they are nothing more than Clinton commercials in disguise.
2007-11-16 01:16:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by old codger 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
http://www.jeffflake.com/media/video.htm
check out the pork-o-meter on this website
lol
CNN wont ask a tuff question did you expect any thing different
Crabby_b... your wrong look at the Jeff flake link i just gave you he is always against pork spending.
2007-11-15 22:30:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Democrats are doing some prrk psendig--but very little compared to the GOP.
If the cons are smart, they'll drop the subject--liberals can take them apart on this one.
Rememper Sen. Steven's "bridge to nowhere? Just to cite one of hundreds of examples.
In other wrds--no questions because there's no issue--not one the cons want to tackle, anyway! LOL
2007-11-15 22:20:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
SSSSHHHHHH, we're not supposed to remember the one time the media mentioned that.
2007-11-15 22:19:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by SFC_Ollie 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Ask about it. It was atrocious......no wonder Bush
vetoed it. He absolutely should have. Democrats
have no shame for running up bills they submit in
Congress with silly, but terribly expensive earmarks.
2007-11-15 22:19:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋