When given the oportunity to answer, those whom ask, what is seeking if humiliation is fair game, denial?

Question

Perceptionally, if words are misquoted, taken out of context, if someone asks, gets answered, then abuses the privellege either as jealous, ignorant or just plane stubborn idiocy, why would you bother?

Surely there is a greater truth in not being small minded, perhaps naive, or ill informed, or personally perceptionally deceived on only what is wrong and never right with the world.

Does yahoo when answers or questions can not be deleted by either the questioner or anwerer when set in concrete have an eternity for denial to those who seek and the relativity is as much based on companies ahead of the their time having privelleged information where ignoramaces prove their vanity?

Is abuse the only reason for removal upon reporting, or during an election campaign is the victimization of key individuals seen as desirable to free speach by yahoo?

Surely choice is as much about the right to deny as to give?

Answer 1

I don't know for sure but I think you're asking if Yahoo!Answers should allow questions to be asked whether they're stupid or not.

Yes, because people have as much right to be an idiot as an award-winner.
Most people have different concepts to what a certain term or phrase means, as they come from entirely different backgrounds and means.

Usually questions/answers are only reported when they're inappropriate (or the person reporting them is just doing it to be assanine) or at least I'd hope, for the inappropriate part.
Yes, there is a greater truth to it but you never really know what they're trying to find out unless they put it in implicitly great detail (and in grammatical structure, to some extent).

The thing, dear, that you should make sure to keep in mind when asking questions on here is that you need to keep things simple. One, two thoughts MAXIMUM to a sentence. Otherwise people will get lost in what you end up saying, rather than what you originally asked. No offense meant but, there have been several replies that go along with that same idea.

You want to get things across in a way that most people can understand unless you're trying to single-out the over-educated crowd and get your answers solely from them.
Unfortunately, as you've pointed out, too many people use things in the wrong context and don't realize it, usually because they aren't aware of the full or true meaning. But we can't censor that simply because it's inane. You just have to take the good questions (or the questions you're best suited to answer) and go with those, not just insult people without answering their questions.
Hope that got a little of what you were asking.

(Sounding intelligent is one thing; sounding pretentious is entirely different.)

Answer 2

It appears that you are making an attempt at intellectualizing. Unfortunately, you are failing miserably. Your question doesn't make any sense. However, if you are complaining about Yahoo's authority to delete supposedly non compliant comments or questions, then you may have a point like many others before you. In some cases, references to a particular race may get you a violation while many others seem to get away with it. Likewise, a reference to a particular candidate may get you a violation while many others can seemingly get away with bashing other candidates and the President to no end. Your deciphered point is well taken.

Answer 3

properly, i do no longer ask questions like that so i won't have the capacity to respond to that query. you're conscious that, logically, evolution is ridiculously impossible? What i ask your self is, "Why do no longer any of those evolution followers ever clarify how interior the international a cellular 'comes to a decision' to do something different than reflect itself properly?" quite, that technique is frequently called, "maximum cancers" and it KILLS the host organism. heavily, we've all forms of typical "this mutated into this, which in turn mutated into this" junk floating around yet has anybody ever stated an organism evolving? no longer genetic decision, now, that may not what i'm speaking approximately. particular, if in basic terms tall human beings get married and function babies, populations gets taller. yet clarify to me at what identifiable factor cells initiate changing on their very own and species "exchange into new species." At what factor does the little legless organism's DNA choose, "i think of we will advance some nubs immediately. waiting adult males? ok. MUTATE!" How approximately, "ask your self twin powers, activate?? sort of ______ shape of ______" i'm of course no longer a scientist. yet i'm asking a severe question. tutor me how this works on a cellular point and tutor me the duplication consequences. Then i'm going to be keen to contemplate this "thought" as a possible thought.

Answer 4

It would be good if the questioner or answerer could delete words that they regret saying later down the track but *sigh* only Yahoo have that privilege

Yes filth can be deleted & thats good i think


Words are often taken out of context
especially by a male & then he can get angry!

Answer 5

I think we all answer the question we WANT to answer, not necessarily the question asked.

Of course, I can't really tell just what you are asking... so...

It really rips my wig when Yahoo deletes one of my answers and never even reads it first!

One of my answers was to a question "Is blue third?" or some such tripe, which I answered "Always remember to take your meds when the Dr advises." and included a link to a digital pill-box with an alarm.

They deleted it!

Answer 6

Your grammar is atrocious, as are your attempts to paint a comprehensive picture with your phrasing.

"ignorant or just plane stubborn idiocy, why would you bother?" That's "plain", not "plane".

Are you now going to report me for my answer?

Edit: Oh, and I understand "big words" just fine. You simply do do not use them correctly here.

Answer 7

There are a lot of words here but it is very hard to understand what you are actually asking. Perhaps try to re-phrase using simpler language for us people who are slow to catch on to your writing style.

Answer 8

I certainly agree with your last statement. I have a very hard time understanding what came before. Sorry! ♥