Pre 1970, there was a need for liberals. Civil rights laws needed drastic changing and there was a true and just cause for liberals to lobby for change. Like the labor unions, affirmative action and liberalism, the laws have long been changed and there is no real need for them anymore. But, they won't go away, will they?
Liberals have to regurgitate past sins, in movies and news stories, to try to keep themselves relevant and needed, although the laws have been changed and we should be healing and coming together, not pouring fuel on the fire of civil unrest.
Communism will never be accepted if it's presented honestly and without bias, for people to make their own decisions. So, communists have infiltrated most every liberal "selfish interest group". e.g. Jessie Jackson's primary advisor through his early years, was an avowed communist. The list is long.... How do you think that the communist influence has hi-jacked Dr King's message and turned our civil rights leaders into race baiters and opportunists?
Since the laws have been changed, socialism and communism have hi-jacked the liberal ideology and most liberals don't even see it. Yet, they goose-step towards communism by attacking capitalism's core- family, faith, patriotism, marriage and God. Most liberals have no clue that Michael Moore is attacking the core of America, to create distrust, loss of faith and crush the spirit that made America great.
Not all liberals are communists but most liberals are highly biased and emotionally based thinkers, they can be easily manipulated with communists tricks- class envy, hatred of upper class, demonizing anyone who opposes communism as evil, etc.
Sadly, the John Kennedy democrats are becoming the Joseph Stalin democrats and most are clueless, as they goose-step towards hell!
2007-11-15 13:46:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Quite all members of the raza do vote for dems. But commies remember that socialists are traitors and few do mix their vote with bobos youpies middle classAlway sth efight Trotsky-Stalin and the séparation during international socialist meeting in Tours 1934 Sometime sher ethey ar eOk to gather for elections and get more poeple elected but few later is coming the discord lol And at the top during spanish civil war the different component of the frente popular faught one again the other letting Franco easy after a a while.
2016-05-23 08:30:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I vote for who I choose. Those whose values reflect mine. I am not a sheep swayed by who is endorsed by whom.
You should try thinking for yourself - it is difficult but certainly a lot more rewarding.
If the best you can come up with to attack Democrats is that someone you don't like has endorsed them - you really need to spend more time listening and less time producing drivel like this.
2007-11-15 13:25:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sageandscholar 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
If your idea of communism is what it was in the 30's and 40's then you have a lot to learn. Communism has evolved considerably since then and adapted itself to today's life.
All those nations across the word and in Europe especially who have been directed by left parties have it all wrong ? are they all living under the rule of tyrants with gulags as a stay for those who refuse to conform? come on... this is 2007 for Pete sake.
2007-11-15 13:35:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by caliguy_30 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
it is better to vote for parties endorsed by communists, then parties endorsed by satan
2007-11-15 13:21:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Just because someone supports a party does not mean the party supports them. This is a dumb argument
2007-11-15 13:16:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋