English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-15 12:17:35 · 41 answers · asked by ღLady Rowdy AKA Carinaღ 2 in Politics & Government Elections

41 answers

Hillary Clinton bc she is more established. If Obama got the nomination the republicans would just throw in his face every two seconds that he did not have the experience especially when it comes to national security matters. She has the name, her husbands legacy of economic progress, extremely intelligent, and runs a text book campaign by never missing a step.

2007-11-15 12:21:47 · answer #1 · answered by smartass23 4 · 1 2

Hilary Clinton

2007-11-15 12:20:53 · answer #2 · answered by barnaby_362003 3 · 0 2

It could still be too early to tell. No one's had a meltdown yet. If you mean who should the Democrats nominate to win against the Republicans, I think the Republicans like either of these two candidates because the Republican Party doesn't believe America will vote for a woman or an African American for President, or for that matter, a Mexican American or anyone standing with the poor and downtrodden - they could be in for a big surprise. Look at the Republican line-up: all white males. Look at the Democratic contenders: anything but all white males and probably the most progressive group of contenders to the Democratic nomination for President ever.

Should be an interesting race.

2007-11-15 12:56:56 · answer #3 · answered by endpov 7 · 1 0

thinking the probability that Hilary might want to win the Democratic vote, Obama will run as an Independant and chop up the vote (Obama will probable even get the various perfect wing vote). If that occurs, neither will see the Oval workplace. in my view, i'd like to work out a chop up vote, because i imagine that a three celebration gadget might want to be the perfect treatment for a extremely dirty political container on the prompt. at the same time as i'm no longer waiting to bounce on with Obama, some conservatives are and that can make the subsequent race extremely exciting. i imagine the Republicans favor to counter with someone who has shown himself to be a impressive economist and who nevertheless stands strong on the idea that authorities shouldn't take delivery of to a lot administration over the lives of the yankee inhabitants. someone who human beings can trust... we've not considered that in both celebration's Presidential applicants in a lengthy time period.

2016-10-24 07:45:20 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think Hilary Clinton!

2007-11-17 09:44:33 · answer #5 · answered by Little Angel 2 · 0 0

Hillary Clinton-She already ran the country when her husband was president so she already has 8 years of experience.

Obama has some great ideas, and I probably wouldn't mind him being our president but he lacks the experience. Clinton was first lady for 8 years, so she saw first hand what the job entailed and she was also a senator for close to 8 years (like Obama).

Just hope their universal health care bills fail, if they pass, you think taxes are high now? Just you wait...

2007-11-15 12:21:56 · answer #6 · answered by metalman31 2 · 2 1

In the primaries, Clinton clearly. In the general election, it is less clear. I would have said Obama, but he seems increasingly like a flash in the pan. So I would give her the edge there, too.

2007-11-15 12:26:25 · answer #7 · answered by blueevent47 5 · 0 0

Obama has a better chance in a general election

2007-11-15 16:57:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hillary Clinton appears to be the Democratic frontrunner at the moment. There are many who hope she wins the nomination for she will be slaughtered by the Republicans in 2008.

2007-11-15 12:22:29 · answer #9 · answered by googie 7 · 2 2

Good question. I think Hilary, there are enough feminists to get her voted through and too many racists that would never vote for Obama, simply becuase of his name.

2007-11-15 12:19:26 · answer #10 · answered by Sam 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers