We should do absolutely nothing about her. She (and Rush and Sean) is our greatest asset.
When ignorant, hateful people like her expose the nasty side of the right it sends moderate voters our way.
Give her a soapbox any time she wants it - we are really just giving her the rope to hang herself.
2007-11-15 12:55:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sageandscholar 7
·
5⤊
3⤋
alright folks. all of you grab chairs cos this may take a while.
people say ann the man deserves free speech, yeah? so do you all think she isn't crossing the line? she can bring a priest to west hollywood restaurants (mostly owned by gays and lesbians), she can talk out against religions, cultures, etc. but Don Imus is pulled off the radio for calling the women's NCAA championship winning team "nappy headed hos?" i'm not supporting what he did. trust me. i'm african. but do you not see any similarities? how different is "nhh" from labeling Al Gore, Bill Clinton, and John Edwards "*******?"
she has publicly stated, several times, that she wants to kill certain groups. to all you coulter fans i'm assuming you see no harm in such statements.
a few weeks ago in west hollywood, she took a priest to a lesbian-owned restaurant. what does the convey? the priest represents the bible. the bible, which she will claim she has read, supposedly states that homosexuality is a sin. i don't mean to deviate, but there is tons of homosexuality in the bible. if there is any kind of sexuality that the bible is strongly against, it is beastiality. not homosexuality.
back to topic. priest in west hollywood. nothing said. i don't think such an act is that far from burning a cross in front of a baptist church.
she made sure to make one comment while being recorded. coulter stated that timothy mcveigh made the error of not bombing the New York Times building. is this not a terrorist statement?
hasn't that been the country's agenda since 9.11.2001? anti-terrorism. we did $2 worth of damage in Afghanistan because of terrorism. we bunny-hopped to iraq for the same supposed reason, no? that's what all of you conservatives voted for.
ann the man is on the same level as George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden. but no one is afraid of her because she has no power. everyone assumes she's just utilizing her first amendment. the same amendment that had Imus fired, Michael Richards scorned, and Rosie O'Donell hated (the only reason she's hated is because she's a democrat; conservatives got leeway.
so, to fully answer your question, don't kill her lol. she should be as hated as the 3 listed above. she should be jobless (not like she already isn't). when she begs for a job, tell her no. unless you make her work in the New York Times building. if she refuses to work their, make her work with jews, muslims, women, and homosexuals. and put no cameras are recorders around her; that's her definition of true suffering.
bastard of a woman. if she is one. i bet she'd be sleeping with dubya if it weren't for the fact that she's a hermaphrodite.
2007-11-16 17:01:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by la_bella17 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think we should do anything.
Let me give you an example.
During WWII, two British Special Forces operatives were sent behind the lines, tasked with killing Hitler. They had Hitler in the sights of a scoped rifle. They were ordered not to shoot. It was determined at higher levels that Hitler was more valuable to the Allies alive, since he was, at that point making all the wrong decisions. I could point out at least a dozen major decisions that he made incorrectly, including his no retreat policy on the Eastern Front, and the delay in development of the ME-262 jet fighter (he wanted it to be a dive bomber), but I'll let you read the history yourself.
Ann Coulter does more to undermine the conservative agenda than any liberal ever could.
As for Christians being perfected, the rumor is that Ann is somewhat profligate in her sex life.
2007-11-16 03:04:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Charlie S 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Pity her, I geuss. I feel bad for her that she is such a hateful, rude, closeminded, discriminatory, disgusting (etc....) person. but then again she made herself that, so I dont feel that bad for her!
I dont think she has and right to call herself christian (and I'm not even christian, cuz I beleive in God, but not religion) Because christianity means following christ and being christ-like, and Jesus really was a great, accepting, kind, caring, open minded, equality-ist sort of person.
Nothing like her!
I seriously think that the Conservatives are even getting sick of her!!
actually, I know a lot of cons who are getting sick of being cons too!
so, when is she gonna learn some kindess respect, and learn to SHUT HER MOUTH!!!
Just stop listening, ignore her, and dont let her bug you, cause thats what she wants!!!
2007-11-15 13:56:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by shouting is better 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
Your answer: THIS PROVES SHE IS AN fool: She does not understand easy biology. She pronounced evolution is impossible by way of complexity of the cellular. She has no authority to make such ridiculous comments. Evolution happens while mutations are made after fertilization. while the DNA of the dad and mom combine, a technique spoke of as "crossing over" happens. "Crossing Over" in and of itself does not produce evolution. in spite of the shown fact that, at that factor mutations can ensue that are diverse from the two the parents. it particularly is the term "genetic version." If this trait is handed on and different offspring do as nicely, a transformation in a species can ensue. it particularly is evolution. She desires to recover from it and are available into the 21 century!
2016-12-08 23:05:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Comes the day when Ann (The Man) Coulter refers to Barbara Streisand, Sarah Silverman, Alicia Silverstone, Sharon Stone and Goldie Hawn as "Nappy-headed Ho's," she will be drummed out of the business.
Until then, take no notice of her.
2007-11-15 12:02:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by MenifeeManiac 7
·
5⤊
3⤋
Let her talk, its her right under the 1st amendment. After all we let all manner of liberals talk, we even let one encourage killing the President. So its not a big deal. If you don't like her, don't listen or change the station.
2007-11-16 16:07:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
First, we should begin referring to her as "Andy" Coulter. J/k...I keep staring at that "adam's apple" going up and down and find it hard to believe that is a woman's throat. I get so engrossed, I rarely hear the trash that she spews. She does know how to sell her books, though. Somebody buys 'em!
2007-11-15 12:03:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by ArRo 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
She is like a horrid disease... and she does make me sick... I try never to watch or listen to her. But she should be removed from anything public and maybe locked away on a funny farm.. she is obviously very sick.
2007-11-15 14:20:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Debra H 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
She's also called all Arabs "rag heads", insinuated that we should take away a woman's right to vote, and called Edwards the 'other' f word.
That dog is off her leash, and needs to be put down. She is too reckless for her party's own good.
2007-11-15 12:14:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋