2007-11-15 11:41:05 · 5 answers · asked by gorgeous gm 4 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
I find reading papers more satisfying (as well as informative and entertaining). The papers aren't compelled to keep the story down to few soundbites inside a two-minute spot, and the stories are more in-depth, at leisure to contextualize events in current realities. Also, I appreciate opinion columns in the papers more than television interviews--there's more honesty and less fear. The humor is more subtle, there's more scope for imagination (and entertainment) and I can digest the paper at my own pace. Best of all, there are no commercial interruptions, just a bunch of ads you can skip over easily.
2007-11-16 04:37:38 · answer #1 · answered by Patricia Evangelista 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It am sure that newspapers print what readers want to see just to sell their own paper while TV has no Axe to grind and, on the whole , give news as in a more correct form. I have often read an apology from a paper who have printed incorrect facts but never from a TV news broadcast. That, I think, speaks for itself.
2007-11-15 19:51:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If interested in great deal of information on a topic than reading large city newspaper. If interested in entertainment while eating TV.
2007-11-15 22:18:05 · answer #3 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reading the newspaper. TV news, both broadcast and cable operations, are just headline services designed to attract a crowd.
2007-11-15 20:06:09 · answer #4 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither, i find both depressing. Sometimes i find yahoo headlines similar to reading the crappy newspaper headlines. Tv is just as bad, i really want to read more books.
2007-11-16 12:11:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋