English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.yahoo.com/s/737220

2007-11-15 11:15:58 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

2 answers

One can argue that they did not halt executions, but the lower courts halted them. One could also argue they halted executions when they accept to hear the case to determine if lethal injection is a cruel and unusual punishment. Cruel and unusual punishment violates the Constitution of the United States. It is interesting what was not originally cruel and unusual changed over the years. Who knows some day as technology changes it may be considered execution will not be cruel and unusual if death occurs by instant vaporization using sound waves, laser, or nuke.
You are correct, their decision is going to be interesting. And it is also going to be interesting on how each judge votes.

2007-11-15 14:52:10 · answer #1 · answered by oldcorps1947 6 · 1 0

To review whether the process of execution by lethal injection is a cruel and unusual punishment which would violate the Constitution of the United States. If I remember right, that is the Supreme Court's job, is it not?

2007-11-15 11:19:01 · answer #2 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers