English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've been offered Hossa for Kiprusoff. I'm hurting huge for RW talent as I have Perry and Lupul at the moment. In nets I have Kiprusoff, DiPietro, Mason (and can get the suddenly decent Theodore as a FA).

The second trade offer i got was Kane for Sakic. I have an abundance of centers...Sakic, Spezza, Getzlaf and Langkow. I'm thinking this is a fairly even trade. THoughts on those two trades?

2007-11-15 10:57:40 · 6 answers · asked by Kristian M 2 in Sports Hockey

6 answers

I'd trade for Hossa, doesn't seem like its Kips year, espcially when the guys infront of him are abandoning Kip.

I'd also take sakic if I were you, I'm sure after smyth starts heating up, sakic also do 5 times better than he is, not saying he's not doing well now, as for kane, I'm sure he'll soon hit the wall.

but ya know thats just me, not an expert or anything

2007-11-15 11:07:10 · answer #1 · answered by The Problem Solver 3 · 0 0

Do NOT get Hossa. He is playing horrible this year, and trust me; Kipper is invaluable. Without him all you have is Mason and DiPietro. That's a baaaaad duo. Don't trust Theodore yet, there's a solid rotation in Denver so he only plays every other game.

Kane for Sakic is not a good trade, but you do have too much centers, you could go for it. However I must say that Sakic is still dishing out assists like crazy, and when he comes around to scoring he will be one hell of an asset to your team. But Kane is producing exceptionally well right now. You could do this trade because you have 4 Cs, but if I were you, I'd just keep Sakic and trade Spezza for a higher-caliber player (Spezza's always injured).

2007-11-15 11:17:18 · answer #2 · answered by N/A 6 · 0 1

I'd maybe go for the Sakic trade, but definitely NOT the Kipper one. Theodore's suddenly "decent?" Wait a month. You'll be kicking yourself BIG time if you make that trade. But if you are doing well at center, and center IS the easiest position to fill later anyway, then a good RW for a good C will always be a good move. I'm not personally that big on rookies, but if you're that bad off at wing, it might be worth a shot. You are definitely loaded at center anyway. It's no big loss.

p.s. Wow. I'm surprised that people are disagreeing with me. Here are two things to consider: 1. It's a LONG season. What appears great now might not for the next three months. 2. Kipper's the real deal, and has no decent backup to take his place. He's off to a slow start, but like I said, it's a long season. If you lose him and are stuck with DiPietro and Mason and Theodore, I guarantee you that you'll watch your goalie stats fall later this season, and those are a LOT harder to fix later than scoring stats.

2007-11-15 11:06:42 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 0 0

Considering who your other goalies are, grab Hossa. Kipper isn't playing very well and wait until Keenan starts his yanking antics.
I'd keep Sakic. Spezza is your only other number 1 centre and Burnaby Joe will get it going. Kane is great for a keeper league, but still a rookie on a very young team. I think he'll cool off as the year progresses.

2007-11-15 11:05:29 · answer #4 · answered by kelowna42 3 · 0 0

i think of you ought to get $15-25 money for Paper Mario and MP8. Any PS2 interest gets you $2-10, GBA video games $2-10. So, provided that, the fee will probable fall someplace between $35-fifty 5. those are only guesses, of direction.

2016-10-16 21:33:03 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Solid I would take the Hossa Kippy trade more reliable goalies are key to winning fantasy match ups.

2007-11-15 11:05:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers