English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The evidence is so far from that notion. The majority of the founding fathers were diest and there is numerous evidence to support that. They were very concerned with no government sponsored religion, and although they came from Christian backgrounds and principles, there intent was to keep America from mixing government and religion.

2007-11-15 09:16:41 · 15 answers · asked by Other 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

Because it was.

2007-11-15 09:22:03 · answer #1 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 1 8

Pat Robertson has additionally claimed that September eleventh exceeded off by using fact of our usa's attitude in the direction of homosexuality and different such nonsense. So he isn't any stranger to announcing outlandish issues. That pronounced, he does signify many conservative evangelical Christians, which, as an entire, signify an extremely tiny fraction of Christendom as an entire. I agree that the Christian community has some extreme subject concerns to handle in terms of particular representatives of the religion. i think of the desirable thank you to try this's to steer by ability of occasion and coach people who not each and every person who represents Christianity (and greater especially represents Christ) is a wild, outlandish televangelist who will say and do something to proceed to be seen and sell a Christianity that's not merely worthwhile, yet a travesty for people who particularly signify a rich and captivating faith. desire i've got helped.

2016-09-29 07:45:27 · answer #2 · answered by graybill 4 · 0 0

The Bill of Rights is a very good piece of evidence that the founding fathers were founding a government that respected the rights of people and not a government that respected a religion.

desotobrave
If a person cannot have freedom from religion then that means imposing a religion upon someone. Therefore, that would not mean that people have a freedom to choose what they believe. Keep the government out of the religion business and vice versa.

2007-11-15 09:19:48 · answer #3 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 3 1

They think their followers are gullible enough to believe such blatant lies. Sadly, some of the ignorant replies here seem to show that they're right.

Here's what our founding fathers were really thinking when they wrote the Constitution:

"Where the preamble declares, that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed by inserting "Jesus Christ," so that it would read "A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion;" the insertion was rejected by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination."

-Thomas Jefferson, Autobiography, in reference to the Virginia Act for Religious Freedom

In other words, even back then they had a radical fringe trying to impose their views on the rest, but those fanatics were voted down because freedom of religion is for EVERYONE, not just for Christians.

[edit]
Three thumbs down for Thomas Jefferson??? That only helps to prove my point because it shows how shockingly far our country has strayed from the intentions of its founders. People take freedom for granted to such an extent they see nothing wrong with taking some of it away just to give their party or religion more power. The fact that it even makes sense to say "party or religion" in the previous sentence should be disturbing in itself. Religions and political parties should never be allowed to come that close to being synonymous. I'm a Christian but I'll vote against anyone who tries to make church and state one and the same. Keeping religion out of the government and government out of religion is the only way to have freedom of religion.

2007-11-15 09:32:26 · answer #4 · answered by ConcernedCitizen 7 · 1 3

They did have the advantage of seeing how religion messes up politics, and in fact still does. Shiia and Sunni may look bad now, but the battle between the Catholic Church and the Protestant church was just as bloody in its day.
Even now many cannot stand the idea that those of another denomination can get into 'their' heaven.
Running a country needs stability and that won't come with the kind of Evangelical Christianity now being pushed, its of a type that none of our founding fathers would have known.
But then we are asking for reality of people who believe in a physical heaven and hell.

2007-11-15 09:28:46 · answer #5 · answered by justa 7 · 2 2

Our founding fathers were trying to get away from being forced to follow the king's religion in England. We were founded on the basis of having the ability to choose what religion to belong to. I most closely identify with the Buddhist religion. I hear more Christians talking awfully about other and doing really non Christian things. I guess as long as you show up to Church on Sunday they don't care what you do the rest of the week. Same goes for the teenage Catholic that gets pregnant because they don't believe in birth control (but premarital sex is ok???) HYPOCRITES!

2007-11-15 09:31:52 · answer #6 · answered by piphop 3 · 3 2

From everything I have read, the founders of the USA did not want the church controlling the government. They never believed religion should not be prominent in its effect on this country.

2007-11-15 09:19:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Because this is a free country and you can believe any looney thing you want. Look at all the people that think Gore and then Kerry beat Bush in the elections. Look at all the 9/11 conspiracy tards. Don't worry go crazy.

2007-11-15 09:26:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Truth of the matter is that no one these days really "follows" these guys. But there is a second religion "atheist" that is taking on the soapbox of recruitment. They both should just leave people alone.

2007-11-15 09:23:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Good grief, not another "deist" rant. Also, too many simpletons make the mistaken leap of logic by equating the desire not to have a national church with a desire to hide from our judeo-christian foundations.

2007-11-15 09:27:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Their religion is tradition based so they create an historical mythology to help prop up their religious mythology.

2007-11-15 09:25:57 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers