English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Well i watch the Maury show lol and i have always seen them doing lie detector test on people if they are cheating well why they dont put it on criminals instead on investigating every thing?? well im just curious this question just came out from my head well PLEASE AND THANK-YOU. NO HARSH ANSWERS PLEASE!!!

2007-11-15 09:02:49 · 4 answers · asked by HeArTs N StArS =P 3 in News & Events Other - News & Events

i dint know what category to put it in =(

2007-11-15 09:03:29 · update #1

4 answers

A lie detector is not 100% foolproof. They can give false negatives and they can give false positives.

Here is a quote from an article about them.
"Scientific studies of polygraph results have shown that the machines themselves provide unreliable findings."

http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=222

2007-11-15 09:07:26 · answer #1 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 0 0

Actually a such thing as a lie detector test dosent exist.So right off a lie dectector is a lemon statement, like selling you a used care that is known unreliable. Its called a lemon.

A stress detector test exist that dictates how nervous you are and tries to read your stress.However this detector cannot tell where the stress came from.

Also plenty of prosecutors have been found to tamper or fabricate evidence, and the last thing you want is a stress detector that cannot prove where the stress came from , as a prosecutor.

Just like all kinds of things can influence a blood pressure test, the same with the poly wanna cracker lemon machine.

And to volunteer for one would be to enable a lemon machine.


Defending the despised to take on the mighty evil machine

2007-11-15 13:30:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

some human beings do no longer react properly to tests, others overreact. Chicago had a ordinance that anybody accusing police of misconduct had to take a lie detector attempt in the previous examine or prosecution ought to proceed. Council exchange into instructed it would stop frivolous court docket circumstances. regrettably for city attorneys the complainants frequently handed their lie detector tests and police refused to take a plausible opposite attempt. The complainants then went to state and federal courts and charged the two criminal and civil misconduct quotes against officers and city- The cities 'required' lie detector tests have been ordered to be submitted to grand juries and juries who logically asked the place is cops lie detector attempt? value somewhat to settle circumstances, some officers took long leaves, ordinance exchange into replaced i think of however the case regulation exchange into commonly used- if police or city corporation demands lie detector or has it as determination they are in a position to't refuse to hold defendant clearing attempt to court docket for jury to be sure.

2016-10-16 21:18:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Thats actually a good question..I think they should do that, i dont see why not. It would sure help out even if the lie dectors gave out false positives and false negatives..The criminals wont tell them the truth anyways..

2007-11-15 12:14:19 · answer #4 · answered by mommyandbaby 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers