Did Kennedy get shot because he wanted to revel UFO´s, did Carter get told by Bush that he cannot revel it? Did Clinton really want to revel it also? Does the (House/Senate) Intelligence Committee know about?
2007-11-15 07:22:48 · 8 answers · asked by freeorbit2000 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
Former Arizona Governor Fife Symington I witnessed a massive delta-shaped, craft silently navigate over Squaw Peak. He says he will be joined by 14 former high-ranking military and government officials from seven countries who will share evidence. We want the government to stop putting out stories that perpetuate the myth that all UFOs can be explained away in down-to-earth conventional terms. cnn.com
2007-11-15 07:52:42 · update #1
President Kennedy conflict with Truth & Government:
page 36 the sharing of classified UFO data ....Here Kennedy was requesting .... hand over the most guarded secret-ever. .... It is also significant that Kennedy's NSAM No.271 was the last coming from Kennedy's desk just before he left Washington for Dallas. What the real significance is remains buried somewhere within the CIA and Angleton spent many a day trying to figure out who ordered Kennedy's execution. Was Angleton set up, .... The legend of James Jesus Angleton and his "wilderness of mirrors" .... Perhaps, he was its victim ....
Understandingly “Myth” hype and story line sells books which provide income, people just love and no one will ever know; hence the perfect Government COVER-UP, real purpose to extract continued funding for covert Government projects not related to any UFO; for sixty years not even presidents, politicians nor Pentagon Chiefs Command know of the true Cover-Up details;
2007-11-15 08:23:47 · update #2
Dude, you REALLY need to get your head out of all the conspiracy theory books!!
All those presidents didn't reveal the UFOs because they aren't there!!! Can you possibly imagine any race intelligent enough to cross the interstellar spaces allowing themselves to get caught and held in a desert bunker?
2007-11-15 07:35:22 · answer #1 · answered by dansinger61 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, Kennedy was shot for the same reason that US Rep. Louis T. McFadden was poisoned. Both of them presented a threat to the unconstitutional powers of the Federal Reserve. The powers involved are the creation of money and the regulation of its value. Those powers are supposed to belong to Congress. But in 1916, they were hijacked by the members of the Federal Reserve System. Those members are bankers, not government officials, and their aim is to control the nation's money in such a way that they, without doing any work at all, can become the eventual owners of everything, purely because of monetary accounting trickery.
It was treason for our government to go along with this Federal Reserve money system in the first place. Louis McFadden was trying to sound the alarm, so the banking conspiracy (I wish people would stop sneering at the mention of that word) had him killed. John F. Kennedy used an executive order to strip the Federal Reserve of its illicit powers and restore them to Congress, and so the banking conspiracy had him assassinated.
In fact, you can trace this very same malevolent purpose right back to the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. The fathers of the bankers who murdered McFadden and the grandfathers of those who murdered Kennedy were the ones who ordered the murder of Lincoln. After the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln became inconvenient to the Rothschilds by introducing "greenbacks" as a form of government currency which was issued debt-free to the people. The displeased bankers ordered their agent, Judah Benjamin (who had been Secretary of the Confederacy during the Civil War) to hire an assassin to get rid of Lincoln. The assassin happened to be an actor named John Wilkes Booth.
So, yes: there are people who are "more powerful" than the president, in the sense that the president is afraid to oppose them. But they aren't (necessarily) government officials or employees. Their power over the president derives from their history of killing high-ranking officials and getting away with it, plus the fact that they can devastate the US economy before anybody could gather up a means to stop them.
2007-11-15 09:42:45 · answer #2 · answered by elohimself 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you invent something, like fairies (or aliens), you can then argue for their existence by saying that the government or other agency has "proved" they exist because they are keeping quiet about it.
Do you understand how stupid that is?
There are lots of fantastic real things to get interested in. Read real science.
2007-11-15 08:02:07 · answer #3 · answered by nick s 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i would love for e.t. encounters to be real. i do believe in aliens i just don't believe they are here. jfk being shot in dallas probably has more to do with the politics of the time, vietnam and the cold war than over aliens.
2007-11-15 09:38:13 · answer #4 · answered by i am him 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unidentified Flying Object's are public.. Most people have seen things in the sky that they cannot identify.
2007-11-15 07:35:41 · answer #5 · answered by Renaissance Man 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the cia knows more than the president. i wouldnt be surprise if the president doesnt even know! like in independence day!! lol
2007-11-15 07:47:37 · answer #6 · answered by §eeker 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
have you EVER tried to keep a secret?
the gov't cant keep secrets either.
Flying saucers do NOT exist. Alien invaders? nope.
Live in the real world... and fasten your seat belt.
2007-11-15 07:45:54 · answer #7 · answered by Faesson 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
None of that is plausible. It isn't technically impossible, but I mean come ON!
2007-11-15 08:03:41 · answer #8 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋