Simply put, no on all counts.
2007-11-15 07:14:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Voice of Reason 7
·
10⤊
1⤋
Let's put it this way: In 1992, Clinton was elected over an incumbent, which would not have happened if the country was in good shape; in 2000, he delivered the State of the Union address and said, "My fellow Americans, the State of our Union is better than it has ever been!" and not one major newspaper columnist wrote a column saying, "No, it isn't." Now, imagine that, in the SOTU earlier this year, Bush had said that. Do you think anyone would have written otherwise? From 1993 to 2000, America's standing as far as its economy, its sense of justice for all, and its admiration around the world went up, up and up, respectively. From 2001 to 2008, it's gone up and down but mostly down, way down and into the toilet. And, of course, when the World Trade Center was attacked in the first year of Clinton's Presidency, it still stood, and the men responsible were imprisoned within 2 years and are still there today. When the World Trade Center was attacked in the first year of Bush's Presidency, it was destroyed, and Bush promised to get the man responsible, and would not rest until he had done so, and mocked Clinton's approach to terrorism as a "law-enforcement problem," and... almost seven years later, where is Osama bin Laden? I don't know if anyone can make the case that Clinton was a better President than Bush any better than that. As for whether Bush is the worst President ever, well, you have to include the two men who made the Civil War inevitable, Franklin Pierce and James Buchanan; the President who took us from a previous record high of economy to the all-time low, Herbert Hoover (not that it was all his fault, but he could have gotten things back on the right track and he didn't); and the biggest Presidential disgrace of them all, Richard Nixon -- and say what you want about him, but, unlike Bush, did have some accomplishments worth celebrating despite the scandal.
2016-05-23 07:20:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sigh.
Yes, there is consensus among historians that George W. Bush is at least one of the worst presidents ever. But it takes time to truly gain perspective on this. Anti-christ seems a bit overboard.
As to Bill Clinton, yes, he did accomplish some things and was quite popular, but I think even few of his devoted fans would call him the best president ever. What about Washington, Lincoln, Roosevelt for starters?
2007-11-15 07:17:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Since you love Slick Willy so much, please be the 1st to enumerate what initiatives of his created the economy of the 90's. Granted the welfare reforms happened on his watch, BUT it wasn't his initative. The 3 strike initiative came from California. Arafat played him like a cheep fiddle.
Please enlighten us non-Clinton people. I will acknowledge one thing he did - He showed the world what a Joke N.O.W. is!
Guess this is just anothor Clinton lover that can't show Clinton had any positive impack on the world.
2007-11-15 07:28:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by viablerenewables 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Careful....your ignorance is showing. The "Anti-Christ" will draw people to him, he will be well liked and seemingly wonderful. Then the worm will turn. As far as Clinton, I'm so sorry, but I don't share your glowing opinion of him. He is a good politician, but was never a good president. President Bush isn't hated all over the world, our country and everything we stand for is hated in parts of the world, it wouldn't matter who the president was. Before you start fling the term "anti-Christ" around you might want to study your Bible. Thanks
2007-11-15 07:51:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your biased opinion does not equate to truths or even facts. It was not the many sexual escapades that got Billy Boy in trouble. It was his LYING UNDER OATH that was the crime. Allegations have been brought against Bilbo for sexual assault. Hillary has been named his conspirator for threaten the women into silence. Shady land deals fallowed by shadier campaign donation and a staff member committing"suicide", are Bimbo Billy's legacy. Ya he was best all right, best at being a philanderer.
2007-11-15 07:26:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mother 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Regardless of whom they are, no person ever can get into the White House and do the job worse or better without at least one person complaining.
No matter who is elected, who was in the past, people will continue to whine about something in the presidency.
None of us can do it without some sort of opposition from the public.
People think they can, but if you think about people in your life that have disagreed with you on anything, that's all it takes.
2007-11-15 07:17:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by tercentenary98 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Our BEST president was Harry Truman. As for the antichrist, I'm not sure whether it's Hillary or Yoko.
BILL gave us NAFTA for which China is eternally greatful to him for and his gun control did nothing to stop crime, his three strikes still gave you two chances to do some righteous crime.
2007-11-15 07:21:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
They both do the bidding of the International Corporate Fascist Movement.
Bush does not qualify as an elected president.
Clinton is not in the top tier of presidents.
2007-11-15 07:20:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Mr. Orph Wow you have done some homework. Do you have anything on Bush or Cheney?
2007-11-15 07:27:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by EC HERE 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perjury is still illegal isn't it, I've been out of school a long time, granted, but I haven't heard anything about that law being changed.
2007-11-15 07:40:34
·
answer #11
·
answered by DJ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋