If Ron Paul ran with Huckabee would they beat Hillary Clinton?

Question

Ron Paul is the most opposed candidate to the war which will sit well with voters since most people dont want their family and friends or themselves going to war. Also he is against abortion something that alot of americans are turning away against but at the same time has some liberal ideas which can attract voters from the blue states. Whereas at the same time hillary is very liberal and probably wont win in the south and paul would easily take that or any republican for that matter. If Ron Paul/Huckabee ticket the key to beating hillary clinton or am I wrong and why?

Answer 1

No.

Answer 2

Probably. ANY Republican would have an easy time defeating Hillary, who is so polarizing that half of the country has already said they WON'T vote for her. I think Huckabee and Paul would have a pretty easy ride, especially with Huckabee rallying Christians and the grassroots, anti-war appeal of Paul. Heck, Paul is more anti-war than Hillary is.. If Hillary is nominated she will be the target of a witchhunt unlike this country has ever seen. She will spend her entire campaign trying to dodge and explain dirt on her and not even be able to talk about issues (which she doesn't even have strong opinions about in the first place)... I just hope Democrats do not make the most common mistake they always make - nominating a lackluster, wishy-washy corporate-sponsored candidate with little chance of winning a national election.

Answer 3

merely approximately any candidate can beat Hillary Clinton in 2016. good campaigners do no longer make good presidents This has been shown via Obama. it particularly is honestly no longer a Democratic 365 days to win and the greater terrorism assaults that ensue international huge, the less probability Democrats could have. history and time is against the Democrats. the reality that america exchange into no longer present day interior the Paris march particularly potential no longer something because usa has no chief and that exchange right into a march for international leaders. Our president is disengaged. His ideology and his golfing sport and his interest in redistribution of earnings regionally trump the rest, even the destruction of western civilization. Hillary is at present tied to his rules.. He won't have the capacity to matter on , so merely bide some time till we get a international chief back,, who no way would be a Democrat.. while the marketing campaign starts there will be 1000's of commercials showing what our do no longer something secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, did no longer do. Ben Ghazzi and " What distinction does it make now?" re runs will run commonly to tutor how ineffective Hillary exchange into in allowing the lie touching directly to the video to benefit via Susan Rice on national television approximately our lifeless ambassador and the 4 others. What a shame for our u . s .. How ought to a awful secretary of state ever make an outstanding president?

Answer 4

I think Joe T that you are wrong. Throughout the years there has been a lot of talk about the silent majority, I think that you might be hearing from them soon. The Internet has given them a voice, and increasingly they are being heard. These people talk with their checkbooks, and if the amount of money that Ron Paul has raised is any indication, then I think it might surprise you just how many Americans think this might be a very good ticket.
It would certainly give the American voter a clear choice, which is something he hasn't had in years.
Ron Paul is the best candidate for the job, and if you add Huckabee to the mix, I think you would have a very effective team.
Many Americans want our Country and our Constitution back.
Many of us would like to see the end of the wholesale slaughter of a generation of babies. Many of us would like to see a return to "self-reliance". Many of us would like to see an end to taxation without representation. The only group that is getting represented in the taxation are the recipients of entitlements, those of us paying for them, are not represented at all.

Answer 5

National Zogby Polls. Most Repube's beats Hillary in the national election.

Faux News and the rest of the corporate media keeps saying she is the Front Runner..... Why is that?

As a liberal I would pick Ron Paul and Huckabee. They are the only ones though I would consider.

Answer 6

Perhaps you should wait until there is a runoff to determine IF either Clinton or Paul or Huckabee are even still in the running......nevertheless, Paul and Huckabee would never be running mates, as they are polar opposites and don't agree on most issues.....however, I highly doubt that either one of them will be running in anything other than the primaries.

Answer 7

No, and I just don't think Huckabee would consider a run with Ron Paul.

Answer 8

If Huckabee hooked up with Ron Paul that would end his career in politics.

Answer 9

Americans are not "turning away" from abortion rights. The MAJORITY of Americans support abortion rights.

Huckabee doesn't even believe in Evolution! I presume he also thinks the earth is flat. His anti-intellectualism, anti-science, extremist right wing religious views will only play in the dark, forested South states where the savages live.


As for Paul, his own rather oddball ideas will kill him off. He is too radical, and too isolationist to win many votes. Most Americans do not, in fact, want to abandon the UN in a time of global terrorism, they do not wish to desert NATO in the time of a resurgent Russia, and they don't wish to abolish the Federal Reserve in a time of volatile economic conditions.

Answer 10

This is possible. Ron paul and huckabee are smarter and better political candidates, but hillary seems too popular.

Answer 11

Huckabee maybe, Ron Paul ---not on your life.