Please refer to the preceding answers. That pretty much sums it up.
She's a pandering, narcissistic, self serving, socialist.
2007-11-15 06:45:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by The emperor has no clothes 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Blind ambition! That's what comes to mind when I think of her. She doesn't have a real platform, but don't believe for a moment that she doesn't have an agenda.
I also think there might be something there with regard to all of the accusations that she is nasty to people and extremely arrogant. I don't know her personally, but I wouldn't associate with anyone who presents the persona that she does.
2007-11-15 14:42:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by MrOrph 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
I thought at one time that she was an incredibly intelligent, smart, and hard-working person.
But now I think that she has sold out and doesn't really stand for anything. I think she's a typical politician and not much different from the Republicans.
2007-11-15 14:37:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Unsub29 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
I think that she's untrustworthy...she racked up enough investigations just being a First Lady, let alone the actual president (whitewater, cattle futures, filegate, travel gate, and oh the many people who DIED and had files go missing that were connected to the Clintons)..she's already flip-flopped on issues and she's only in the stages of telling us what her ideas are on them... no thanks.
2007-11-15 14:45:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by jaimelleonard 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
" I can't recall."
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58449
http://prorev.com/wwindex.htm
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071030/ap_po/clinton_video
Anti Clinton Video Draws Web Audience... where it went? but this remains:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq8aopATYyw
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/10/25/clinton-defends-her-lobbyist-money
http://news.independent.co.UK/world/americas/article3075691.ece
Opportunist. For the Love of Politics. That's all she wrote.
2007-11-15 14:57:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Control freak and hungry for power. If she becomes president I"m moving to CANADA!
2007-11-15 14:44:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by aimstir31 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
She might not have the "ideals" and "goals" that you want but she's got something more than half of america lacks... cojones!
2007-11-15 14:43:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by ~Becks~ 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Vile old hag with a bad case of the flip-flops.
2007-11-15 14:35:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Willing to compromise herself to further her goals.
2007-11-15 14:38:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Maudie 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Power mad narcissist only interested in furthering her career and ensuring her place in history. Not interested in the common or greater good.
2007-11-15 14:34:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋