Whats wrong with EVERYONE paying 10% tax across the board?

Question

Why cant we get this passed? Its OUR MONEY right?

You make a million, you pay 100,000
You make 100,000 you pay 10,000
You make 10,000 you pay 1,000
If you make 1000, better get more education quickly

BUT ITS FAIR!!!!!!

Can you BELIEVE the MARXIST answers?????

Answer 1

Because it won't work and it's not fair. Paying 10% of your income when you earn 10K is a whole lot different than paying 10K of 100K. It unfairly favors the rich.

Answer 2

No, it's not your money. Would you use that argument to refuse to pay your electric bill? You enjoy the benefits America offers, you pay for them.

What's wrong with it is that it's only "flat" in the abstract; the reality is that it's a REGRESSIVE tax, a tax that effectively gets higher the further DOWN the income scale you go. When you shop at Prada and vacation in Gstaad, paying 10% of your income in taxes is a minor inconvenience, like a mosquito bite. When you're skipping meals to pay your rent, paying 10% of your income in taxes is totally devastating, like a great white shark attack. The Prada shopper is obviously getting a lot more benefit from our American system and therefore should expect to pay more -- not only more in absolute number of dollars, but more relative to degree of benefit.

Answer 3

of direction, yet they have already lied approximately spending cuts each time they are "provided". Spending cuts by ability of the government, the two party would not remember as they are merely 2 facets of the comparable tax and spend coin. In different words, it ain't gonna take place. The Repubs will cow-tow by using fact the Dems could quite see the U. S. fail and lose reserve forex prestige than cut back the outrageous ranges of entitlements they promise (and taxpayers furnish), by using fact the recipients of those entitlements many times vote for people who develop/proceed their sacred cow courses. extraordinarily the greater youthful recipients (i.e. not on SS by using age) who do not know any greater desirable. in some unspecified time interior the destiny there'll be a reset, and no one is going to be certain it coming and no one is going to be waiting to provide up it. the u . s . would be a large element, however the effects are unquestionably initiate will probably come from the ecu as a worldwide difficulty. Our "representatives" are too grasping for the prestige quo to repair the roof on an identical time as that's leaking, quite who prefer to enable the residing house provide way and then blame the different element. we will not TAX OURSELVES OR cut back SPENDING sufficient TO MAKE A distinction. whether the U. S. government stops ALL discretionary spending (protection stress blanketed), latest debt provider and entitlement necessary spending is above the quantity we are able to assemble in taxes by ability of hundreds of tens of millions of greenbacks. the only answer is crash-then restoration.

Answer 4

As long as there's a reasonable cap on the percentage, I love the idea.

Forcing the government to function on a budget is a fabulous idea. Unfortunately, nobody seems to be able to make it work.

The only problem I can foresee with a flat tax is that government still decides what the percentage will be. Hillary will decide that 95% is about right. That leaves 5% for cigarettes and beer... which will be taxed at a higher rate because we shouldn't have either!!!

edit; Janniel, that's not a tennet of taxation, it's a tennet of Marxist doctrine. From each according to their ability... straight from the Communist Manifesto!

Answer 5

and while you are making a million, you are getting tax incentives from the states of 100,000+ for expanding your business into their state.
I can see where someone who makes over a million, like you would feel that is fair.

Answer 6

Makes sense to me. Plus if you had a 10% sales tax as well as a 10% income tax, wasteful consumption would be discouraged and saving rewarded.
Objection would come from those who depend on more complicated tax laws to keep them in work, like acccountants, tax lawyers, lobbyists, govt employeees etc.

Answer 7

Good idea with one exception. 10% of $20,000 means a lot more to that person than 10% does to a person making $100,000. Otherwise , it is a great idea.

Answer 8

It is inequitable. One of the canons of taxation is ability to pay and the rich can afford to pay more than 10% without suffering, while the very poor cannot afford even that.

Answer 9

Study the Fair tax.

Answer 10

Hey 10% works for me. If God can get by on 10%, surely the government can!