Mike Huckabee because he doesn't seem like he will be able to pull off the nomination but he is a good guy with lots to offer our country.
2007-11-15 06:15:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by vincefoster 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hope he doesn't win the nomination, but I would say Huckabee or Thompson would be best, it would balance out the ticket; a northern liberal, and a Southern conservative.
2007-11-15 06:10:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dr. Ray Langston 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Fred Thompson. With those two on the ticket, even if they won, they'd be too lazy and incompetent to do anything truly horrible. Also, they'd make sure no one elected a Republican again for a long time.
2007-11-15 06:10:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Huckabee or Thompson I suppose....that would balance out his more moderate views on social issues.
2007-11-15 06:10:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Diamond24 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The fact he is considered a serious candidate mystifies me. He won't make far enough to pick a running mate.
2007-11-15 06:09:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by gone 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
haha you gotta be kidding... a running mate for him when he can't even keep a wife? You're joking right???
2007-11-15 06:28:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ditka 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
the guy from Iran would be a good match
he's much more conservative than Rudi, would balance the ticket nicely
2007-11-15 06:08:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
HILLARY
2007-11-15 07:00:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by dave g 2
·
0⤊
0⤋