English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Because of Bush many young men died early, no weapons of mass destruction can be found, also the economy and the health care have been terrible. September 11 took place under his leadership. Things can get any worse. I believe George Bush was the worst president ever and should have been impeached long time ago. Do you agree with me?

2007-11-15 05:49:04 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

28 answers

yes, yes, yes

2007-11-15 05:53:29 · answer #1 · answered by Mariangeles Golfo 1 · 1 4

No. You say that GWB should be impeached. Please tell me on what charges. If one looks at the constitution, it clearly states what is an impeachable offense. A soldier takes an oath to defend the country and follow the orders of their superiors. The soldiers knew that death was a possibility when they raised their hand. Your statement on WMDs inaccurate. We found no real nuclear WMDs, but large amounts of other banned weapons banned by the UN resolutions were found. Health care and the economy are products of numerous presidents and corporate greediness. I suggest taking some college level economics classes to learn about what the government does today, takes many years to really have an affect on the economy. The recent mortgage crisis is an example of this, and the Fed Reserve is responsible for that. As for 9/11, Clinton, Bush 1 and even Reagan all had chances to stop Osama. As for Bush lying to the public about the why, I don't think he did it the grand scheme of things. Sure he might not have told us everything, but that is his right as the leader of this country, Please remember that Clinton was impeached for lying to a Grand Jury. You or I do that, we would go to jail. IE Martha Stewart. Nothing happened to BIll when he stood there and waived his finger and said he didn't have sexual relations with that woman. An out right lie. Bush may not have been the most effective leader in our history, but I would say he is not the worst. I would say that honor goes to Carter for the near term and possibly Andrew Johnson the over all history of our country.

2007-11-15 06:09:57 · answer #2 · answered by cockytiger 2 · 2 0

Believe what you want, and hate whomever you hate. Blaming Bush for some of the things you list like 9/11 is just plain ridiculous. And by almost all measures, the economy has been stronger than in many other recent times.

He's certainly not a Jefferson or FDR, but history isn't likely to judge him the worst even if you wish it would.

And if you want to count military deaths, stack this war up against earlier wars - you might be surprised.

So to answer your questions - no, I don't agree with you that he's the worst, although I'm not claiming he's the best ever either. And yes, I think things can get worse, and that there's a real good chance they will over the next 8 years or so.

2007-11-15 05:58:06 · answer #3 · answered by Judy 7 · 4 1

Not even close. Under the Bush administration economy I've found a great job, bought a great house, and have been able to save quite a bit of money. I have health care that I'm very satisfied with and don't want to pay for your health care no matter who the president is. While I think that going into Iraq was ultimately a mistake, I know the worldwide consensus at the time was that Saddam did have WMD's and I understand the reasons we went there. Now we have to clean up our mess. I think Clinton, Carter, Johnson, Kennedy, Pierce, and Harrison were worse presidents than Bush.

2007-11-15 05:57:36 · answer #4 · answered by VoodooPunk 4 · 3 0

I dont believe he was the worst ever. Although I disagree with some of his stances (immigration), I believe that He took a stand and made a decision (more than I can say for any democrat) and he stuck with it. Our nation has lost many lives due to the fighting over seas, but think how many we have saved. He has thwarted many terrorist attempts here and over there. Since when is our economy terrible or our healthcare. The Dow is higher than its ever been, unemployement is low, and people still flock to the US for our great healthcare. It's so much better than any form of socialized healthcare that the dems are proposing. You got bad info dude!!!

2007-11-15 05:57:37 · answer #5 · answered by Go Blue 3 · 3 0

I am neither conservative nor Republican but the dubious honor of worst President belongs to Jimmy Carter.

But yes, King George should be impeached - along with most of Congress.

2007-11-15 05:59:03 · answer #6 · answered by mikey 6 · 0 1

#a million) Herbert Hoover not merely sat atop a melancholy.. he instituted many rules that made it worse, and did rules that could desire to have helped to previous due and made it even worse nevertheless. #2) The financial gadget has been becoming and rich for many of he Bush tenture. till George Bush has something as undesirable Economically and Socially by using fact the melancholy take place on his watch he's unquestionably above hoover (however in fairness to vacuum he did not initiate the subject concerns which lit the tournament.. he merely made them worse)

2016-09-29 07:25:10 · answer #7 · answered by hone 4 · 0 0

Your rash thinking proves that you have no knowledge of previous presidents of the US. Just because you don't agree with a President's foriegn policy, does not mean he is the worst president ever. Have you ever heard of the likes of Nixon, Clinton, etc. People who actually lied under oath and committed perjury as opposed to try and keep terrorists from repeating the death and destruction we know as Sept. 11th 2001. Think before you speak and judge not...lest ye be judged. Words of advice to someone who obviously need to hear them.

2007-11-15 05:54:54 · answer #8 · answered by E to the Jay 2 · 5 1

Nope, Andrew Johnson. But I do dislike Bush (and I'm Republican)

2007-11-15 05:59:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Ahhh, but so many conservatives and republicans have mumbled their worship for Bushco that you'll never get them to admit their mistake.

They won't come right out and support him, now that his governance has proved utterly disastrous... but they'd turn around tomorrow and vote for somebody just like him.

Republicans never learn

A year after Nixon resigned in disgrace, they had already forgotten the bad he'd done.

2007-11-15 05:53:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

No, not at all. The economy has been fantastic under Bush, health care has not changed at all under Bush, Sept 11th can only partially blamed on Bush, more of the blame should fall on Clinton. As far as bad Presidents go, here is a short list of the bottom of the barrel.
Buchanon
Pierce
Fillmore
Carter
Grant
A Johnson
Clinton

2007-11-15 05:52:01 · answer #11 · answered by booman17 7 · 7 7

fedest.com, questions and answers