2007-11-15 04:11:07 · 5 answers · asked by Madman111 1 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
I agreed with the first response in going with Bobby Engram. He's the more consistent of the two, Chicago's defense is just terrible, especially the secondary. I wouldn't expect huge numbers from both, but I say Engram grabs 6 balls for 70 yards, possibly a touchdown.. compared to Toomer's 3 receptions, 24 yards, and no chance of a touchdown.
If the Giants are going to score through the air, it seems to me that all of those balls will go to Burress or Shockey, two better options then Toomer. In Seattle, who really is a better option then Engram? Hacket? Burleson? Sure, they're both good.. but none of them are really better then the other.
Like I said, go with Engram, and good luck in your league.
2007-11-15 04:24:00 · answer #1 · answered by the_phenom2004 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bobby Engram in Chicago
2007-11-15 04:14:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Engram
2007-11-15 04:42:45 · answer #3 · answered by jclayato 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Burress isn't shown like HE would desire to be. i think of Toomer would have a greater clever interest yet i see Barber working properly and being the famous guy or woman for the Giants. i think of Toomer would have a weaker DB insurance and think of he will grab a td. Shockey if he performs(injured) stands out as the suited receiver.
2017-01-05 13:28:28 · answer #4 · answered by demitro 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Flip a coin.
Seattle isn't all that good this year and Chicago's D could cause Hasselbeck to have a long day.
Detroits D has been surprisingly good this year and Manning/Toomer haven't been clicking.
2007-11-15 04:16:05 · answer #5 · answered by Fester Frump 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋