2007-11-15 03:42:24 · 10 answers · asked by spoelee23 2 in Politics & Government ➔ International Organizations
Nothing. Goes to show that international organizations with supposed political authority hold no clout when it comes to getting anything done.
League of nations failed. UN failed. There should not even be a 3rd attempt at foundation for world government.
Honestly who are we to have say in what is going on there if the neighboring countries do not care 1 bit.
Its terrible what is happening, but it is a problem they should fight to resolve. It has taken quite a long time for the killings to take place there. Nowhere NEAR Rwanda levels. So there should be some sort of local resistance.
With that said, we learn thru history there are those who fight back, and those who dont. Not fighting back ensures continued death. Fighting back means possible death to not only those fighting back, but those attacking. The later offers the chance to stop the advancement of evil in the first place. However if there is no fighting back, evil can freely flow and have its way.
So we see burning settlements in satelite imagery. We see cases of abuses and killings. We see people starving after being pushed from their settlements. What do we do. Do we invade Sudan? Do we start a war? If so, do we ignore the politics of sudan? Do we pledge our lives and finances to "rebuilding" another country?
Things arent as simple as "stop the bad stuff". It always ends up being trillions of dollars, thousands of american lives, and overstepping our constitutional authority to interven in foreign affairs.
2007-11-15 08:27:35 · answer #1 · answered by vote_usa_first 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
They support Genocide
China is the model for the world under an NWO one world government. This clip from ENDGAME details the NWO plans for their eugenics program and the enslavement of mankind.
Phasing out the human race will solve every problem on earth, social and environmental. -- Dave Forman, Founder of Earth First!
If radical environmentalists were to invent a disease to bring human populations back to sanity, it would probably be something like AIDS -- Earth First! Newsletter
The battle to feed humanity is over. In the 1970s, the world will undergo famines. Hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. Population control is the only answer -- Paul Ehrlich - The Population Bomb (1968)
I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000 -- Paul Ehrlich in (1969)
In ten years all important animal life in the sea will be extinct. Large areas of coastline will have to be evacuated because of the stench of dead fish. -- Paul Ehrlich, Earth Day (1970)
2007-11-17 17:38:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
United Nations does not want to intervene in Sudan because it is an internal problem that the Sudanese must solve.
2007-11-17 12:07:22 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So far, they have not accomplished much. They have sent their humanitarian convoy to the area and it is establishing relations with the Jangeweed and the Sudanese government. There are some aid workers stationed their, giving primarily medical and food relief. There are some troops stationed there, but not enough to call a complete "cease-fire" as they could be easily overrun by either side. It is just a mess, but at least they are doing more than the AU did.
2007-11-15 06:48:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nothing useful. But something very expensive.
The UN can't solve that problem. They're just wasting our money, part of it. Most is kept to pay incredible huge salaries to people that provide nothing in return. It's a waste from my point of view but they're having great lives.
2007-11-15 03:50:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Debating what a proper response might be and sending sternly worded letters.
2007-11-15 05:01:50 · answer #6 · answered by RTO Trainer 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nada!
2007-11-17 15:08:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing, because they want it to happen. Don't believe the lies.
2007-11-17 05:11:22 · answer #8 · answered by bacco l 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not enough.
2007-11-16 11:17:18 · answer #9 · answered by jalady 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the same thing they always do, NOTHING.
2007-11-15 03:51:06 · answer #10 · answered by Jan Luv 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋