Bush is not attacking americans?

Question

I read this story, and I was shocked to see that I actually agree with Bush. He is not attacking americans or making our life worst in this one instance. He is acting like he cares about how we live. A rare occasion.
Perhaps, I missed it, but he seems to be on the right side this time.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071115/ap_on_go_pr_wh/airline_delays

Answer 1

I agree, and he just want to NOT be blamed for this too.

Answer 2

everything he has done has been in the best interest of the American people and freedom-lovers the world over... some of his actions have not been popular with some.. but then again, you can't please everyone... and being president is no different. he's had to make some strong decisions.. some may be a little inconveinent.. but, that doesn't translate into he doesn't care, or attacks americans, or making our life worse... so, i'm not sure about your comment...

and to the person with the gas comment...

not his fault gas is 3.50 a gallon.. if the wacko environmentalists and members of the democratic party would allow us to drill in Anwar and off our coasts and build new refineries.... we wouldn't have to depend on foreign oil.. and therefore would not have 3.50 a gallon.. be more like 1.50 a gallon.. if that. when you import over 65% of your oil from overseas, this is what happens...

Answer 3

There are other instances where Bush does not appear to be "attacking americans or making our life worse". Part of the administration's strategy is to make small gestures to appear that he is looking out for our best interests.

If it came down to really sacrificing his agenda for the good of the most people, that won't happen.

Answer 4

The "crisis" potentially affects less than 8% of the entire population of the US and that is worldwide travels not just in the continental US.

Bush is an egomanic and somewhere along the line someone told him that this is a good story line and to get his monkey face out there and talk the talk. Do you believe for one second he or his family or anyone that he knows will be sitting on a commercial airliner this holiday season? They have AF1 or their own private jets to take them wherever they want to go.

Bush is on his OWN side...always has been.....always will be.

Answer 5

While I applaud his efforts in this area as the airlines have become decidedly unfriendly towards consumers, I think it would better serve the interests of the American people if he would attack the oil companies for their strategy of greed. I am sick of watching gas prices climb dramatically. Then hearing oil companies tell us they really aren't making money as they post record profits every quarter. However, to your main point. I don't agree with many of the policies Mr. Bush favors, but I have never been of the belief that he hates the American people.

Answer 6

If Bush is on the right side, it is completely accidental.. and he will switch as soon as Cheney takes him out behind the White house and shakes him a little.

At this point Bush could develop a halo and I would would not believe in him and still want him as far away from Washington ton as possible. He has ruined America!

Answer 7

Bush has never attacked decent Americans. Just look at all the Bushophobic idiots who answered this question and you will see the true enemies of American freedom, the liberals...

Answer 8

Your factor is unquestionably taken yet lots of the american freedoms they hate choose stated. like the assessment between how we ruin and over coddle women human beings while in comparison with their dark a while approach over the place a woman's place is. We meddle in international affairs in the call of human rights yet turn our returned on oppressed human beings in African international locations. To their point of view the U. S. govt is a hypocritical liar and bully. A one international govt can't exist as long as Islam stands in the way. They worry us by way of fact they understand they're on the NWO time table for eventual removing. by ability of inflicting chaos right here it buys them time. The underlying difficulty is many years previous, it replaced into all started on the tip of WW 2. we could continuously have listened to Patton and MacArthur and eradicated them, wouldn't have formed the state of Israel, and eradicated the Russians whilst we had the only enormous stick in life. i think of we could continuously have additionally placed the Berlin wall on the French border. The Patriot Act is comparable to maximum govt labels as that's actually its names dazzling opposite. So hypothetically your assertion is sweet on. the undertaking is that an analogous those with a hand in the attack, additionally drew up the Patriot Act.

Answer 9

It is about time. Only when he knows he is a lame duck and under the scrutiny of a Democratic controlled Congress does he really give a whit about ordinary people. But I comend him just the same. It is better late than never.

For all you cons out there. See, we have a lib actually complimenting your god.

Answer 10

I never heard of any president in the world who would wish bad to his own country and its people. Even Saddam wanted good to his country and its people. The question is how they achieve the good. Sometimes what president thinks is good turns out to be too bad.
I am sure he cares about Iranian people not less than he cares about Iraqis and Americans.

God bless the president. He is too good to be true.

Answer 11

Many of his policies and even the vetos are misrepresented and distorted. Anyone who can take the time to fairly look at what his explanation are rather than listen to those who just want a bill approved with the additions, will find out that there is consideration based on his decisions. I would like to thank you for taking the time to look carefully.