Because of Hitler he ruined white supremacy for everyone.
Does anyone else think Hitler ruined a good thing?
I mean what about the traditions, my great great grandfather was one of the knights of the missisipi and now i cant take part in that age old tradition.
Anyone else get that feeling?
2007-11-15 02:58:51 · 12 answers · asked by Helping hand 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Hitler was not for "white supremacy" he was for "Aryan supremacy" blond hair and blue eyed to create the master race. It is the KKK who use the white supremacy label. Your avatar shows you with long dark hair, under Hitler that could have been a reason to suspect you as being from a degenerate race that needed to be exterminated.
2007-11-15 04:33:36 · answer #1 · answered by flautumn_redhead 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Anything that espouses skin tone as a means of signifying genetic superiority is not a good thing. If there was one good consequence that arose from Hitler's political views, it was that people finally saw that racial hatred and prejudice could unite a world in a common cause. They unite against it. Knightly traditions of Mississippi? I had not realized feudalism was alive and well in the southern states. Tell me, with all that humidity, how does one maintain ones armour? Rust must be a constant concern.
2007-11-15 22:17:18 · answer #2 · answered by Rebel without a clue. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not entirely sure how Hitler gave white supremacy a bad name, when most of the Jews he went after were white......
2007-11-15 03:08:48 · answer #3 · answered by Krista B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sensibilities and realizations have changed, and that change had little to do with Herr Schickelgruber, the Austrian half-jew anti semite paranoid that the world knows as Hitler. "White Supremacy" as an attitude was doomed from the begining, and only lingers in certain sedctors of the society. ANY type of "Racial supremacy" movement is doomed because this country has come to see all men as equal in regards to their rights. You most frequently find the racist mindset in those that feel inadequate or marginalized, and have to have SOMEONE to react against to ease their feelings of marginalization and innadequacy, and who grasp on race as the criteria for belonging/exclusion.
2007-11-15 06:09:38 · answer #4 · answered by Stephen H 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
White supremacy is bad. So is any other kind of supremacy. Thinking one race is superior to another is narrow minded. You can carry on your culture and traditions with out claiming supremacy. That exactly what culture is. Taditions being passed on.
2007-11-15 03:08:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The slavery and terror of the Ku Klux Klan ruined white supremacy in the United States. It was a self-inflicated wound.
2007-11-15 04:44:18 · answer #6 · answered by Philip L 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
White Supremacy gives itself a bad name. There was no need for Hitler to assist. No one race is superior to another. My white cat doesn't think it is superior to my black cat. Why should human beings?
2007-11-15 04:23:24 · answer #7 · answered by rdenig_male 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Hitler ideology was some more complicated than based only on skin color. It was also about thoerical race descendant, about religion, and so on. He discriminated also Tzigans (white) , Polishs (white), Russians , considered "Sub Humans" (white), catholics (lagers created also many saints...) Hitler ideologi was not simply based on skin color . In general racism have a bad name.
2007-11-15 04:12:16 · answer #8 · answered by lugfabio 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
biologically, we did all initiate in Africa... we developed by ability of shifting northward as quickly as we began to be certain villages, and could destroy the components in a definite section, or grew to develop into too densely populated. The darkish dermis of the Africans is sweet for blockading out a number of of risky quantities of UV gentle, however the added you get from the equator, and the fewer gentle you get. Your physique needs supplementations which it gets from the sunlight to function exact, while the melanin ranges almost thoroughly block the absorption of photograph voltaic we develop a poor bone ailment referred to as rickets. a individual with darkish dermis, who's distanced from the equator could have rickets, and is merely not a alluring mate for the choice intercourse who would not have this ailment (has lighter dermis). So it is the place we see organic determination between people, survival of the fittest by ability of ability to reproduce. and of direction, gentle skinned people breeding at the same time will produce greater gentle skinned people, and that's why we've distinctive races, and we see darker dermis colours in and around the equator.
2016-09-29 07:12:53 · answer #9 · answered by polmanteer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a Native American I can assure you white supremacy IS a bad name. Who do you assholes think you are?
2007-11-15 03:30:47 · answer #10 · answered by JOE N 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋