Should buses have seatbelts?

Answer 1

Most school buses have to have seat belts now, but not public buses and I never understood that, or why it's OK to stand.

Are people who take public transportation, who are ultimately saving the world from exhaust fumes, not worth saving?

Answer 2

Long distance coaches perhaps, but not town and suburban buses. Imagine old and infirm people, mums with a couple of kids and a buggy, and shopping. all struggling to do belts up.. The driver can't go until they are settled... Same performance at the getting off stop, then the people entering the bus go through the same procedure... Buses would be at the stops for ages, route times would need to be much longer. Buses therefore less frequent. How many cases are there on town buses where a seat belt might have reduced or prevented injury... Very few I think... Not enough to justify the upheaval of fitting them and all the aggravation of using them...

Answer 3

If I knew what you meant by buses I could give you a better answer having been involved in public transport for forty years or so. Limited stop which are long distance buses or coaches, yes they should have seat belts without doubt. Many can reach quite a high speed on motorways and anything almost for public safety. However buses, London's buses are restricted to 40 mph and hardly ever reach that speed because of the distance between stops and Lon dons traffic, the same applies to most cities. As for fitting seat belts, I think it was cause a real problem. Can you imagine say twenty people boarding a bus with the intention of travelling two stops, getting to their seats putting on seat belt, by the time they did that they would be undoing them to get off. Who would supervise them, so would anybody bother.
Regret no,not on stopping buses

Answer 4

because of their layout, college buses are safer devoid of seatbelts. a school bus is between the toughest autos on the line, this is not vulnerable to get broken except this is hit by using a commonplace truck. interior the form of a crash some teenagers could get bumps, bruises, or in all probability some broken bones despite the fact that it is quite uncommon for a newborn to get heavily injured or killed in a school bus crash. each and everything is padded, and youngster's physique shape is greater helpful suitable to take an impact and not using a lap belt then constrained with one, particularly if some teenagers are constrained and a few are not. After a crash, it is likewise greater helpful to have teenagers unfastened to flee fairly then strapped to their seats and panicking with a buckle. additionally, teenagers do no longer placed on seatbelts on the bus and this is a waste of time to objective and cause them to. The bus motive force can not be busy policing the bus greater then they already ought to on the same time as they are attempting to tension. attempting to maintain 60 teenagers buckled up should not be difficulty-free. On a school bus, a seatbelt can be used as a weapon. it could the two choke somebody, or the buckle could be used like a flail or club. The style of injuries that seatbelts might save is a approaches exceeded by using the style of latest injuries seatbelts might reason. there is likewise the fee of putting in and conserving seatbelts on each and every bus. teenagers are destructive, and the college is way less responsible by using no longer offering seatbelts then they may be in the event that they did furnish seatbelts and one failed.

Answer 5

All the forward facing seats should have seat belts to keep the passengers from flying forward during a sudden stop. I suppose that rear facing seats should be the same way, if there are any.

A seatbelt would almost be useless on a sideways facing seat. Any jolts from the front or back would just send those passengers cutting right into the belts.

Answer 6

We should revert back to the Route-master buses,
they were safer more reliable, and with a conductor on the back usually quicker without the risk of pull-away or hard breaking accidents.
I know they weren't very cost friendly but they worked
seat belts on buses no, proper crewed buses yes.

Answer 7

The law states that coaches have seatbelts and must be fastened.but local buses should have them as well, seen accidents when the bus as braked sharply and ppl on front seats have hurt there selves badly by falling forward.

Answer 8

I believe so, If they enforce motor vehicles to have seat belts, then school buses should most definitely be required to have them, after all they have made it mandatory for us to provide child car seats, and levy hefty fines against those who do not comply, why should the state governments be exempt for that which they require, that sets a very poor example, and reminds me of the old phrase

Do not do as I do, but do as I say.

Governments should always lead by example, and 'if' seat belts have proved to save life, then school buses should most definitely have them.

Answer 9

Buses should not have seat belts, as the belts would restrict the freedom to move about and fidget, esp. on longish journeys! Even on aeroplanes, the belts are mandatory only for take-off and landing, and in bad weather, bumpy rides! Cars have restricted space as such, hence the use of seat belts!

Answer 10

Some of the new buses where I live do have which is good to see.