2007-11-12 14:52:28 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Ask Petter from heroes to look into the future and tell you, or Sylvia Browne!?
Have a star you future curious boy you!
Would you guys pretty please please please answer this? ;)
Pretty, pretty thanks!
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoqeTbeFdQtHl_.nxz.h.UPsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071112095800AAgKcFF
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aig8Y7YrLM.S8BDqyfKvQhzsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071111213006AA8nBOQ
2007-11-12 14:57:41 · answer #1 · answered by ♂♥♀ & ♀♥♂ ∞! Love Oh Love ! ♫♥♪ 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hillary or Barack are not terrorists but are just campaigning against the Iraq war.
VOTE fore your chocie as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know whether Hillary or Barack will likely win.
2007-11-13 00:24:58 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
IF they were to win they would only be considered terrorist by association...Plus, I believe that the real terrorists in the world are hoping for their victory so that we will again be sitting ducks as we were during ole billy's presidency, remember the first World Trade Center bombing, and the USS Cole. Is it a coincidence we have not been attacked since 9/11/01 knowing that terrorists of the world would like nothing better that to attack us on a daily basis.
Did I go on a tangent?? Sorry...
2007-11-12 23:43:52 · answer #3 · answered by John C 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Technically Hillary & Barack are not terrorists as they have committed no terrorist acts. However, they could be considered as accomplices for helping the terrorists.
2007-11-13 06:36:48 · answer #4 · answered by bill j 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The people who are far out there enough to seriously consider them terrorists will probably not have their opinion changed by something like election results.
2007-11-12 22:56:54 · answer #5 · answered by galaxor, destroyer 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Will who? The terrorists? Or the President? Yes to the first, no, probably not to the second. Who considers the candidates terrorists? Dirty liberals, but not terrorists.
2007-11-12 22:54:56 · answer #6 · answered by Brent 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Ah yes!! ol' "W" tell you that? "If you're not with us, then you're with the teerrorists!" oh yes, enlighten us sith lord Bush. How are Barrack and Clinton, who will be far better presidents than Bush could ever be, be considered terrorists for a war that Bush himself started. The war is not congress-approved.
2007-11-13 09:51:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, quite the opposite! Either one of them will be a much better replacement for the current terrorist, Bush.
2007-11-12 23:02:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2007-11-12 23:39:49 · answer #9 · answered by I hate Hillary Clinton 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Only those that are twisted and lead like sheep to the slaughter by smear radio will believe that.
Peace
Jim
.
2007-11-12 23:29:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
why? as if some president was considered as terrorist!!
u Moran!
2007-11-12 22:55:29 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋