I don't believe in Democracies, I believe in Constitutional Republics. And MY Constitution does not provide for the redistribution of wealth.
Let me illustrate this very clearly to you. I am willing to die to to protect the Constitution, are you willing to die to destroy it?
2007-11-12 15:28:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Your awareness of socialism is constrained. you're using an extremely extensive brush - some phantom element called socialism that rewards people for no longer working and taxes to dying people who do artwork. In organic capitalism, wealth is continuously redistributed to the prosperous. In a mixture of socialism and capitalism, the prosperous are actually not the only people who advance richer - all training of society see will boost of wealth. it is often what happens below Democratic administrations - the two the undesirable and prosperous benefit. This equitable distribution is finished by using tax coverage and a powerful social internet. Many Republicans have an extremely reliable damaging reaction to undesirable people who're receiving welfare - getting money for no longer working. the prosperous, in line with capita, and in total, get much greater money for no longer working. They inherit, they are interior the remarkable place on the remarkable time, or have worked to get to the area the place the money flows devoid of any extra exertion. there's a welfare device for the form of prosperous individual - this is called u.s.. the colleges practice the artwork tension, the applying commissions oversee a good power grid, the cities and suburbs furnish a place for hard artwork to stay (police and fire departments, street crews, city lighting fixtures, entertainment centers). we've regulatory companies that save the financial and criminal device so as (no longer completely, needless to say). as an occasion, an investor can assume the courts to enforce contracts, license protection sellers, oversee mortgages for workers and so on. And, u.s.'s relative stability makes making an investment difficulty-free - all of us know that we could have a reasonably non violent u . s . a ., a good artwork tension, and so on, because of the fact we've a good government. In different words, u.s. is a extensive device for insuring that the prosperous traders and organisation vendors organisation acumen isn't undermined by using rampant strikes, infrastructure breakdowns, nutrition shortages, and cheating officers. i ought to circulate on - please ask greater questions.
2016-10-16 07:58:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In all industrialized nations, there is a limited amont of socialism, in terms of health, schooling, etc. How much socialism that enters into America remains to be seen.
2007-11-12 15:37:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kenneth C 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have been moving toward socialism since the 1930s when FDR started the welfare and social security systems. The movement has continued to this day and will continue with the continuation of national health care system. The government will keep adding taxes to the working to "help" those that can't (or won't) work until the people get tired of it and rebel.
2007-11-12 14:41:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Truth is elusive 7
·
6⤊
3⤋
You didn't learn the lessons of the USSR did you? Go talk to somebody who acutally lived under a communist/socialist utopia and see what they have to say about it.
2007-11-12 16:15:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are living in a new generation--and the new generation think they know all there is to Socialism, what it's like, the works!!
If they should decide to vote for a Socialist Democrat? They shall learn, and they shall not make that mistake again!!
2007-11-12 14:43:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jeremiah Johnson 7 7
·
7⤊
5⤋
Not now, Not EVER.....
But if it should by some slim chance happen, I for one will retire and not pay for your socialistic empire, if your young you will be paying me to sit on my *** for the rest of my life, thanks for the handout.
I don't need it and don't want it, but if putzes like you want to give it to me I'll take it!
2007-11-12 14:59:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Nancy P 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I really doubt socialism is coming. We may have social programs, but not socialism. Too much fun being capitalists.
2007-11-12 14:36:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Isaac 4
·
8⤊
2⤋
No.
That is a Republican scare tactic, just like they try to scare people of terrorism.
2007-11-12 14:53:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Too late; it is already here: Social Security, public education, and Medicare (the only part of the American healthcare system that works correctly and economically).
2007-11-12 14:45:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋