2007-11-12 14:29:45 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
I wouldn't have thought so.
Does she really seem like the kind of woman a man could abuse? Although, she has accused him of just about everything else no why not?
2007-11-12 17:49:41 · answer #1 · answered by monkeyface 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
It's a she said , he 's not saying anything type of thing.
I think Heather Mills calculated wrong, she thought she would have the world's sympathies because she played the disabled card that Sir Paul supposedly hit her with her leg . Disabled people don't always call attention to themselves to get publicity and sympathy.
She also thought she would gain North American sympathy by being on Dancing with the Stars. It hasn't helped.
She's playing it both ways, hates the media for their stories but goes to them to tell it HER way.
She is sounding like she's becoming unravelled. Has she been abused, who knows, but I think she's done some abusing herself with Sir Paul's reputation. Barbara Walters said on the View the other day that Heather Mills was not a nice lady to Walters staff when she interviewed her for a second time a couple of years ago.
2007-11-12 22:58:15 · answer #2 · answered by Lizzy-tish 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The price of being a celebrity and revelling in it . Everyone knows how fickle and vicious the media can be. If you can't take the heat, stay out of the limelight. I imagine she has the resources in her life to live very comfortably without attracting further media attention.
2007-11-13 09:34:34 · answer #3 · answered by janniel 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The woman is an absolute bunny boiler!!! I don't usually condone men hitting women, but I could quite easilly give her a good hiding. I hope she's reading these answers.
2007-11-14 20:21:59 · answer #4 · answered by 'Er indoors!! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The woman is a fruit cake and a legend in her own lunchtime.
She knows Paul will never retaliate ( he is too much of a gentleman) so she feels able to say what she wants.
What goes around comes around, wait and see.
2007-11-13 05:19:15 · answer #5 · answered by northern lass 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well I suppose if she lets herself read all her own press then she lets herself feel the abuse they are giving out about her. Whether good or bad press, celebrities need to learn not to take themselves so seriously.
2007-11-13 03:59:39 · answer #6 · answered by Nikita 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She is a complete shrew.
I am sure Paul McCartney is no angel and he has faults, but her - she is "disgusting".
All I pity is the kid Beatrice. I expect she is being used as the "bargaining chip" IMO.
2007-11-13 04:29:12 · answer #7 · answered by shafter 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No she is a fame hungry, wonky faced wacko.
2007-11-15 07:50:44 · answer #8 · answered by Charlene 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In a word no
2007-11-13 17:34:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The gobby, money grabbing, one legged slapper deserves everything she gets.
2007-11-13 09:29:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋