If Bill Clinton did not have a Rep Congress to keep him in check, would he be considered worse than Carter?

Question

I keep seeing all these "Worst president ever" questions, and frankly, I think the Republicans completely saved this guy from being much worse than Carter. Anyone else agree/disagree?

Answer 1

Agree. Clinton was not a good President. His so called economy was a bust. He allowed Osama Bin Laden to get away. He did nothing to curb Islamic extremists. Pretty much a total failure all around.

Answer 2

You mean the man that told the Judiciary and Congress that He was Not answerable to them? Or his equally political wife? I will surely be censured for not trusting Bill. All Congress does now is make sure that the Republicans get nothing done. In doing so; they do not get a thing done that is not self serving in nature either. Anyone else count the $400Million spent on Cruise missiles fired at someone Bill did not like? Someone will report us both for our disagreeing that Bill is wonderful. Bill Clinton is a Lot more use to all of us now. He is making a positive difference now.

Answer 3

Err...well...it depends on how you look at Bill Clinton's presidency. He did a lot of smart things for the country, like helping raise a surplus and making good world decisions, but, he also had quite a few bad ideas. The Republicans didn't save him at all...there was a war of sorts between the executive and legislative branches at the time, so no, I doubt Bill Clinton was saved by the Republican party. However, overall, I have to disagree with him being a horrible president. He did enough good to amount for the bad...and more. I'm sorry if you don't agree with me, but, my opinions are mine and yours are yours.

Answer 4

No, he would have gotten a lot more accomplished as he would not have been kept in court.

Remember, Clinton was able to leave us with a surplus each year of his last four years in office.

The Republicans have turned the surplus into the worst deficit to date.

Bush is going to be known as the President who was worse than Carter.

Answer 5

Oh please, there is no longer even a contest right here. Clinton pointed out the al Qaeda risk and made going after terrorists a precedence. while Bush took workplace, he and his administration disregarded the al Qaeda risk, demoted the counterterrorism unit, left counterterrorism out of the DOJ precedence funds, and disregarded repeated warnings of an drawing close attack. Bush individually disregarded the August 6, 2001 PDB. Then, to suitable all of it off, after our usa replaced into attacked, Bush desperate to invade Iraq, a rustic completely unrelated to the attack thereby diverting components faraway from the conflict in Afghanistan and uselessly expending lives and hundreds of billions of taxpayer money. meanwhile Osama bin encumbered continues to be at large. Bush has plenty to respond to for concerning his dealing with of this so-talked approximately as conflict on terror.

Answer 6

Looking at Clinton's inability to finish things makes it easy to see why Hillary is not the candidate for the oval office we need. Clinton sold out to the Chinese and special interest groups and probably traded other national secrets for sex. His concern was limited to his crotch not the country and we are still paying for errors He made. Carter lacked balls but Clinton lacked the knowledge of how to use them properly. Since Hillary has none she will not be blamed for not using them.

Answer 7

Not at all. The purely partisan obstructiveness of the Republican Congress kept Clinton from reaching his full potential. With a more cooperative Congress, he would have been remembered as one of our greatest presidents.

Answer 8

without the Repubs, Bill Clinton would have put more people to work, and he was our Best President since FDR

Answer 9

We wouldn't of had as good as economic times if he had.