English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

19 answers

Don't worry about that. It'll never happen. (At least not this election).

2007-11-12 13:35:14 · answer #1 · answered by artistagent116 7 · 3 0

Since I am a woman, I can hardly be called a sexist. I have two grandchildren that I love dearly & they are mulatto, the same as Obama, I don't think I can be called racist!
I just don't like Hillary, I think she is not what we want or need as President! Obama is fine but, I don't think that he will get the nomination & if he does he will not get the vote, there are too many racists & his name does him no favors! He is not Muslim! Cut it out! I would prefer to vote for John Edwards although he isn't exactly saying some of the things I would like to hear from a Presidential candidate either! But I would vote for him over the other two & if not him perhaps Obama, last choice would be maybe another Republican! Ouch!

2007-11-12 14:05:40 · answer #2 · answered by geegee 6 · 0 0

That ticket will never happen any way, because they do not like each other. Senator Obama is not about to play second fiddle to Hillary Clinton. And Hillary Clinton will not play second fiddle to Senator Obama.

I think whomever wins the Democratic nomination will pick Retired General Wesley Clark as the running mate. General Clark will appeal to Independents and moderate Republicans.

I think a lot of Republicans (more than 10%) will vote Democrat this election, one indicator is that many have registered as Independents. The number of registered Republicans is quickly shrinking.

2007-11-12 14:42:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

So, if I think for myself and find myself not believing the bs these two have spewed from day 1, Im racist and sexist? i thinkest not. I just have a lil more common sense.

2007-11-12 13:39:54 · answer #4 · answered by Daniel 6 · 3 0

With Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House and 3rd in Line, the Republicans just wouldn't know WHO to assassinate!

Taking Hillary out puts Obama in the Oval Office and no self respecting Neo-WASP would ever be the cause of THAT happening and taking them BOTH out puts Pelosi in charge. The very thought of Nancy Pelosi sitting that wider than necessary backside of hers into the chair George "the W is for War President" Bush sat his "buns of formica" in, would cause Rush Limbaugh's enormous head to develop a parasitic " anal boil" (or should that be paraCYSTic? and also slightly confused, mistaking Rush's exhalations of CO2 to be methane as it settled in to fulfill its destiny as an "anal boil") which would cause his basketball-sized head to exert such inward pressure on the colloidial walls of the 4 or 5 remaining braincells rattling around inside that HUGE auditorium of a cranial cavity (which he somehow supports on nothing but neck fat and tight collars) to warp the area from his fat-smothered Adam's Apple to the tip of his last thinning Homer Simpson hair into the 8th Dimension (IS TOO an 8th dimension! I saw it online on a program about string theory, it postulates the existance of TEN dimensions, actually).

At least, that's what I think would happen. The other scenario is, Republicans immediately launch ridiculous investigation after ludicrous investigation, accusing Clinton and Obama of every crime they can think of, while offering nothing but supposition and innuendo as their proof, wasting time and taxpayer money in a vendetta to take power, to keep power, and to sell their influence to the highest bidder.

2007-11-12 13:42:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Let me ask you something and I would appreciate honesty. If Hillary was a man would you support her the same? If you answer this honestly to yourself I believe your answer would be no and if that is the case then isn't that just as ridiculous as not supporting her because she is female or Obama because he is Black?

2007-11-12 13:58:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It makes you slightly unrealistic, and it could look you help perspectives that must be interpreted as racist or sexist and homophobic and because neither of them needs socialized drugs that's fairly useful to to do extra analyze on the subject material. Its unrealistic because of the fact taxes will could desire to pass as much as meet our responsibilities because of the conflict, we've been battling on credit authorized by making use of Bush to become due and payable after he leaves workplace. Neat trick, wish i ought to do it. because of the fact the present ideally suited court docket has at present ruled against maximum of subject concerns that females, gay, and minorities see as constructive to them, like salary differencials and extra time for homestead healthcare workers, no longer purely the flaws one oftentimes thinks of, it stands to reason it ought to look such as you're no longer drawn to their problems. it is your precise to have a distinctive view. Its my precise to no longer approve of the present perspectives the court docket has and to wish that it ameliorations. customary coverage isn't socialized drugs, and we could desire to understand that as between the richest societys the international has ever seen, we can not handle to pay for to have wellness care become unaffordable, which it has become for some 40 seven million and transforming into those with companies dropping scientific coverage with alarming velocity. it ought to additionally be argued that scientific coverage expenditures are infringing on companies precise to make a income. I fairly have yet to pay attention a usable theory from the contest on what to do approximately this venture. back you could fairly disagree with them on the subject concerns, yet understand that there are clarification why human beings help them, in basic terms as there are which you will assist whomever that's you do finally end up vote casting for.

2016-11-11 07:52:20 · answer #7 · answered by slayden 4 · 0 0

If someone doesn't agree with a liberal, that person is a sexist or racist. Oh yeah, I feel your "pain".

2007-11-12 14:19:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No, but it won't happen. Hillary will never run as VP. And Obabma will never get the nomination.

2007-11-12 13:37:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes, for a lot of people who won't vote for them. There will be a lot of people who won't vote for them because they'd rather see this country go down the tubes even further than what "dumbaya" has done so far, but there are some who won't vote for a woman or a minority - which is sad.

2007-11-12 13:43:13 · answer #10 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 1 2

It would be a very "valuable and positive" combination. The two of them are brilliant and have "moral consciences." You couldn't do badly choosing this pair. I wish you well. Peace, Love and God Bless.

2007-11-12 13:51:03 · answer #11 · answered by In God We Trust 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers