You say it best when you say nothing at all~
2007-11-12 13:04:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by cindy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
This question is more general than specific and therfore requires that an answer be formed on the basis of general information. That is to say: when someone speaks they obviously have said something, but the normal interpretation of having something to say would be that the individual actually had something of importance. Still importance is just as general in concept as is the original question. If we break thei question down further we can see that it is virtually impossible to make an absolute determination based on the limited and narrow aspects of the question itself. Therefore, the next logical step would be to broaden the perameters of the question so as to allow a better grasp of it's purpose and thereby its definition. Still, if we don't determine where the basis of the question comes from we will also find that we may have misinterpreted the entire question itself. The only possible conclusion then would be that we must go back and look at the roots of the words themselves. Historically speaking of course. This \will require us to assume that the words are from a source language. Given all the evidence so far I feel fairly secure in assigning these words to the English language. But, as we know, modern English is the result of many languages over time being mixed and evolved and therefore the root of each word may be found in the near to distant past, depending on it' origin. Once we have establised the root of each word it will then require us to use those base standards to establish the intent of the writer. Once the intent has been established it will then require a psycological evaluation of the writer in order to verify that the intent is consistent with others in a similar group or standing. If this can be determined we will then be ready to finally establish what inquiry we are attempting to put a response to. That reminds me of a story I once heard when I was a child. It seems that there were these 3 men from London who had met in a pub to establish the true meaning of a recent royal edict. To establish this they went through various contortions of logic such as you wouldn't believe. Oh, what a wast of time. This one going on about one nonsence the others doing the same. Well, in the end it seems that when no conclusion was forthcoming they decided to get drunk or some such and well, come to think of it, it wasn't that great a story. I don't know what made me think of it in the first place. Where was I. I seem to have forgotten the question. Oh, no matter. I will tell you about my experiences while working as a bottle washer in stockholm.
2007-11-12 13:17:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by karate 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't believe I have ever had "nothing to say'. I have an opinion about everything and I can even talk about the smallest details. Why, just today, I saw a guy who had a jacket on that said "Focus". I asked him if that was a command or just a suggestion. He told me that it was the name of a car. I then told him that it was probably a good name for a car because more people need to focus when they are driving and maybe by seeing that word on someone else's car, they might pay more attention.
2007-11-12 13:05:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No I don't and it has gotten me in trouble on several occasions. People take my silence as arrogance or indifference.
Grandpa always said "It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than open it and remove everyone's doubt"
Of course.. Grandpa also told me when I was 13 some universal truths.
#1 Never put your finger where you wouldn't put your face.
#2 If you can smell it at the belly-button, open a window.. crawl out and go home.
#3 If it was easy for you to get, how many other guys found it as easy?
So Grandpa was a bit weird... but when I hit about 16 Grandpa made a lot of damn sense.
2007-11-12 13:10:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by nremtohio 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
I am a compulsive talker, but like to entertain people - life is to hard and tooo short not to have fun, and I rant on here just now because my b.f. is in hospital and I enjoy your company, even if what I say is a load of old bolllocks, I speak the truth and don't gossip. G. just ignores me but loves me to bits and he doesn't have to bother talking - he is quiet but we love weekends together you would think we were young but were not. Do you talk like that - nah probably got more sense. My son does not say one word he doesn't need - he is a solicitor and already bloody middle-aged - think its his G.F. she wants to be middleclass and she is a veggie and all that spewings.
He used to be so much closer to me and we were best mates of course that changes but I miss himm as a friend.
2007-11-12 13:14:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've learned when you have nothing to say, DON'T SAY ANYTHING! You will tend to say something either stupid or something you'll regret if you just say something for the sake of filling in dead space. Seriously.
2007-11-12 22:10:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes.I am quite a chatterbox.I talk about the weather,the food I ate,the people I seen or current affairs.I always talk.
2007-11-12 13:04:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by dance21 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Rarely.
2007-11-12 13:04:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the theory say if you alone and you have nothing to do,ACT lick you are surrounded by many people.And when you are with a lot of people act lick you are Alon.so if you alone you sing. if you have a co.. act lick you are Alon;
2007-11-12 13:21:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, because awkward sileneces are just something that I can't really handle. It's really weird sometimes.
2007-11-12 13:05:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by JessyE19 3
·
1⤊
0⤋