English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-11-12 12:38:08 · 5 answers · asked by christine2550@sbcglobal.net 2 in Politics & Government Government

5 answers

excellent point.

They know we won't like it. I think it's torture, and a great deal of people do. They consciously know we wouldn't like it. That's why they think it's best to cover it up.

2007-11-12 12:46:55 · answer #1 · answered by MrPotatoHead 4 · 0 1

I think a better question is if it isn't torture, then why is there such a debate over if it was used or not? If it isn't torture, then there shouldn't be such a big hubbub about it. And what is the significance of its use if it isn't torture? I mean, if it is in fact just water dripping on someone, how is it a means to extract information?

So many questions, but no answers. I think there is a bunch of BS on the part of those supporting "water boarding".

2007-11-12 12:50:20 · answer #2 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 0 2

firstly it is torture, in world war 2 people were charged with war crimes for water boarding POWs.
they are keeping it a secret because it is torture and it violates human rights.

2007-11-12 12:49:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

For one, theres no proof its even happening, its just not classified as torture. I have gone through it and I can tell you, I'd chose that over what happened to Nick Berg.

2007-11-12 12:42:42 · answer #4 · answered by godgunsandgl0ry 3 · 1 1

Interrogation techniques are presumably less effective is the subject has an idea of what to expect.

2007-11-12 12:47:24 · answer #5 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers