Planets are classified as such by their size, mainly, and the fact that they orbit a star of some sort. Jupiter and Saturn meet the criteria.
It's pretty weird to think about, and a little hard to fully comprehend because they look absolutely solid in photos and images, but there's not much real estate on gas giants.
2007-11-12 11:45:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The International Astronomical Union voted (on August 24, 2006) on the definition of a planet:
1. Must orbit a star and not another planet
2. Must be massive enough to be spherical in shape due to its own gravity
3. Must have cleared its orbital region of debris
The gas giants (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune) meet all 3 criteria for planet.
There has never been a requirement that a planet have a solid surface.
If that was the criteria, then the moon is a planet, so are all the moons around the other planets, the asteroids, and every meteorite and comet in our solar system.
2007-11-12 11:43:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Although there isn't a requirement for a planet to be a solid, both Jupiter and Saturn do have frozen gas as a solid ground. I believe the requirement is that it rotates around the sun/star, has enough gravity to round out its shape by itself, and has cleared its area of smaller tiny planets. The last two are what keeps calling a few large objects in the asteroid belt, planets.
2016-04-03 21:39:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A planet doesn't have to be completely solid and these gas giants do have a solid or liquid core.
Besides a planet is anything that is in orbit around the sun, is of a sufficient size, is rounded due it's own gravity and in the case of the gas giants isn't massive enough to undergo stellar fusion and become another star.
2007-11-12 14:12:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by JavaJoe 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
well, geez, our planet has a gaseous and liquid envelope too you know. Just because all you see is the gas doesnt mean there isn't solid down underneath on the large planets.
2007-11-12 11:51:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by busterwasmycat 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
definition of planet:
A planet, as defined by the International Astronomical Union (IAU), is a celestial body orbiting a star or stellar remnant that is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, not massive enough to cause thermonuclear fusion in its inner core, and has cleared its neighbouring region of planetesimals.
doesn't have to be solid.
2007-11-12 11:42:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
WELCOME TO THE PLANETS OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM
THE SUN,, MOVIE,,
http://www.solarminimum.com/IMAX/953.gif
MERCURY
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targetFamily/Mercury
VENUS
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targetFamily/Venus
PICTURES OF THE SURFACE OF VENUS AFTER RUSSIA LANDED THE VENERA 9 AND VENERA 10 LANDERS ON ITS SURFACE,,
http://www.russianspaceweb.com/venera9_mitchell.html
http://www.russianspaceweb.com/venera10_mitchell.html
HERE ARE SOME COLOR PICTURES OF VENUS FROM THE VENERA 13 AND VENERA 14 RUSSIAN LANDERS ON VENUS,
http://www.mentallandscape.com/V_DigitalImages.htm#Venera13
EARTH
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targetFamily/Earth
MARS
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targetFamily/Mars
JUPITER
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targetFamily/Jupiter
SATURN
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targetFamily/Saturn
URANUS
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targetFamily/Uranus
NEPTUNE
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targetFamily/Neptune
PLUTO
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targetFamily/Pluto
2007-11-13 00:38:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by SPACEGUY 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes they are considered a planet. But i dont think they should be because the sun is made up of gas but its a star.
2007-11-12 11:47:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Nimali F 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
our planet is mostly liquid, like 99.9999% liquid (the insides are all liquid remember?????)
so earth isn't a planet by your definition either.
sounds to me like you just made up your own [wrong] definition of a planet.
2007-11-12 12:01:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by jl 7
·
0⤊
2⤋