Why haven't "We the People" impeached Bush and Cheney?

Question

We know the crimes they've committed, yet,they still both hold office.Treason is a high crime.Lying to the American people to go to war,outing CIA operates,invasion of privacy of Americans without cause, etc.Why aren't we protesting this present corrupt government? If Bill Clinton can be impeached for lying to Americans about a sexual incident that wasn't a matter of national security,why hasn't Bush been impeached for the thousands of lives that have been lost based on lies? For those who didn't remember the impeachment of Clinton,please go to my next question.I'm new at this.I brought up "Why didn't people recall... due to the responses I received.Clinton in my opinion was one of the greatest presidents of our time.I thought my questions were legit,but some people are just mean and think that sarcasims and put downs are answers and makes them look witty.

Answer 1

Give up the Kool-aid. PLEASE!

Answer 2

Many conservative loyalists tend to cherry-%. stats and information that favors their slant on the same time as ignoring the rest that should in all probability run opposite to their view. despite the fact that, it is going to be stated that impeaching Bush and Cheney this previous due interior the 2d term is somewhat pointless. additionally, despite the fact that if there have been sufficient information of a criminal offense, there are not sufficient votes interior the Senate to truly convict. Political bias is a extensive element in determining the end result, only because it replaced into the final time around (Clinton).

Answer 3

If any of those things happened you'd have a point. Since they occurred only in the imaginations of left-wing bloggers there will be no impeachment.
Impeachment is a legal action that is based on FACTS. The paranoid delusions of narrow minded fanatics aren't facts.
The Democrats in Congress know there's absolutely no basis for the absurd ranting of the anti-Bush fanatics. As a result they know that Bush has done nothing impeachable.
Go and check the record. Look at actual declassified documents, not blogs or news stories that are full of insinuation but short on facts.
Bush never lied about the reasons for going to war. Anyone who checks the actual facts and not some blog knows this. The only people lying are the ones making accusations that they know are false, (Micheal Moore comes to mind).
Valerie Plame was never covert, therefor she couldn't be 'outed'. If her kids got sick at school they knew to call Ms. Plame at CIA headquarters. Again the only ones lying are the people who claim she was 'outed' when she was never covert, (you now fall into this category, gee, you've already told more lies than Bush,1 vs. 0)
As for treason, if having ignorant bigots constantly lying about you is treason then just about every President has been guilty.
Fortunately treason requires wrongdoing, and mindless ranting by willfully ignorant fanatics is not evidence of illegal acts, since none have been done, there is no basis for impeachment.
In the future try educating yourself about what is happening in the real world, you'll be less likely to be taken in by the political con artists you so mindlessly quote in your question.
By the way, if you think this is "mean" spend the next several months researching the actual facts behind the lies you so blithly repeated. It'll be a lot harder than just going to some political website or blog, but in the end you'll know a lot of truths you'll never find without digging.
Public records of actual events, and declassified intelligence reports about Iraq and Al-Qaida, (many of which date back to the Clinton administration) are a good place to start.
What bugs me most is that I object to many things Bush has done, but the hate Bush crowd makes such completely absurd claims that I have to object to them.
Maybe in thirty years when the fanatics have moved on to some other rant we'll be able to have a real discussion of the pro's (many) and the cons, (some) of the Bush presidency.

Answer 4

You can't impeach someone just because you want it done. They have to actually do something to be impeached for like Bill Clinton and his lying to the supreme court.

You've asked this same question at least three times now. Don't you know that it's against the TOS? Someone should report you for it.

Answer 5

Because Bush/Cheney have not committed an impeachable offense. Had they done so, impeachment would have stuck. Clinton committed perjury-he lied under oat and got busted for it. Lost his law license. Bush and Cheney acted on the information that was given to them by subordinates (that there were WMD's in Iraq). Hillary voted for the war on the same information

Answer 6

Impeachment is actually handled by Congress. They haven't impeached anyone lately because they haven't been able to trump up enough evidence.

Answer 7

Democrats are too chicken to go after him. I think he has done a terrible job as President and should have been impeached but the Democrats don't want to make waves. At least Republics have the guts to go after what they believe in, even if it is wrong. I don't support either side. Instead I vote for people from both sides who seem to care about the things I care about.

Best quote I have heard is from Lewis Black.

"Republicans are a party of bad ideas, and Democrats are a party of no ideas."

Answer 8

For the Same Reasons Elections should Be suspended in States where Identity Theft/Document Fraud is pervasive and American's Identities stolen....Americans Have to stay the course and remain focused on who the Enemy is within our midst. Elections are going to be stolen through document Fraud and Identity theft putting the Sovereignty of the Nation at risk. The Bill of Rights and the United States Constitution have all been breached

Answer 9

Great question, seems again most people just bash questions like this. They must think our rights do not count. Some day perhaps they'll open there eyes.

Answer 10

Have you ever heard of porn. The country is too deep into porn and is distracted. That is the real reason it has not occured.