Well...this may be different...the Patriots have shown themselves as elites of this league and with the Colts losing to the Chargers recently the rift has widened...However, the Colts-Pats game did show that the Pats were human...New England defense looked old and slow just 1 or so quarters into the game and look for that to be more obvious as the season progresses...the offense still looked superb even though the lack of a running game will catch up...trust me, it will...and another thing to go along with your "trap game"...the Steelers won the Superbowl as like a sixth seed or something...so don't crown the Pats yet...there's still a whole lot of football left to be played...
2007-11-12 10:58:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by March Madness 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. This year they are focused on playing 100% for 60 minutes. That's why they haven't let up in mismatched games and that's why they were able to come back and beat the Colts. This is a VERY focused team and they are looking at everyone of their mistakes even if they win by 30. This is the best team the NFL has ever seen, and I don't even like them. But I do feel good to know that I get to see them make history, unlike hearing about the '72 dolphins, I get to see this one happen.
2007-11-12 10:49:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by jae w 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
there's a disparity because baseball has no revenues floor. A crew like the Pirates can collect money from the Yankees and pink Sox via the plush tax and then do no longer something with it except stick it contained in the commercial organization. The Pirates, Royals, Marlins and Padress are renowned for doing this, as werr the Twins before playing extra positive. at the same time as the Twins and Marlins smash out with this because they have tremendous scouting for good low-cost skills, the Pirates upload incompetence in personell judgements alongside with the cheapness to create a disaster contained in the metallic city.
2016-10-24 03:07:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, they won't. The difference between all those teams and the Patriots is that those other teams didn't have Belichick as their head coach. Belichick will keep the Pats focused all through the playoffs, and he is probably looking at tape of the San Diego-Indy game.
2007-11-12 11:54:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sky 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
They won't be victims of nothing. The rest of their schedule is so lame and "Bill a Check" aka "I Spy", will grind their starters and second stringers to the ground. His "no mercy" policy will prevail and they will get home advantage thorughout the playoff and Indy, as they have shown including this past Sunday night, can't play outdoors, will sucumb to them, leaving no hope for any other team to beat them.
I agree with Kenny about who will they meet at the SB, however, contraire to my previous statement, I don't agree with the result.
GO PACK GO!!!
2007-11-12 10:58:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah the Patz are doing great this year but it's too early and their players are being driven too hard. Everyone is gunning for them and chiseling away at their defense. Tom Brady is headed for a Kurt Warner style meltdown.
It's like the Beastie Boys say, something has got to give.
2007-11-12 10:50:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by sam p 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
honestly i think they will become victims, or at least hope. they almost lost to the colts and the colts werent even playing that great. but in reason they will probably go to the superbowl vs the packers and theyll win
2007-11-12 10:47:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kenny 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
They will be the victims of the Steelers (regular season), and the Colts (AFC Championship game).
2007-11-12 10:48:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The past is the past. That is all it is. The Pats will never get ahead of them selves. Bill will not let it happen.
In Bill We Trust.
2007-11-12 11:06:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jazzy 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dream on...The Pats will lose IF and WHEN they want to rest the starters for the playoffs...That will be the only reason...No one is gonna outplay them...*L*...
2007-11-12 11:09:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Terry C. 7
·
0⤊
0⤋