Would Terrorists prefer Democrats of Republicans in the White House? Why?

Question

I will vote for who the terrorists DONT want in the White House!

Answer 1

Well if you can't figure out by now that the Democrats are the ones that the terrorists favor, let's look at the answers you have received so far from Democrat supporters. What you have is the same illogical talking point that somehow fighting back against the terrorists is what makes more terrorists.

That is like saying that pulling up the weeds on your lawn only encourages more weeds. It is just plain silly. We did not fight back against the terrorists since the Carter administration and they sure seemed to breed just fine.

An additional factor you should consider is which party do our troops support? The Democrats know full well that the military votes primarily Republican. Why do you suppose Al Gore went through so much trouble to have the military personnel's' absentee ballots thrown out?

You can vote for the Republicans who have a long, proud history of support for the military or you can vote for Democrats who try to fool you into thinking that if we just leave the terrorists alone they won't bother us. I reject the stupid argument that killing terrorists breeds more terrorists. That is like saying washing your hands only makes them get dirty again.

BS!

.

Answer 2

The last administration of the Democratic party was very Docile and allowed the terrorists to get away with the bombings of two US Embassies and a US Ship. The last Democrat in the oval office went to war on their behalf when he sent American planes to attack the Serbs who were kicking the crap out of the muslims in the Balkans. Al Qaeda loves those Democrats, they can get away with anything when the Democrats are in office.

Answer 3

Are you relating their political schedule's or racism? The founding father of the Democratic social gathering replaced into Andrew Jackson (you may bear in mind him from the $20 bill) who replaced right into a prolific racist, slave proprietor (as many Democrats have been) and Indian killer. yet, he's seen by using maximum to be between the main suitable presidents that ever lived. Understandably, political social gathering's tend to alter heavily over long sessions of time, and now and lower back even over the process a pair an prolonged time. for the duration of the 1st fifty years of the 1900's, it replaced into the Democrats who have been the racist social gathering of the south, and the Republicans who have been greater for lessening the racial segregation (no longer equality, yet this replaced into only before the Civil Rights circulation). Eisenhower after all, replaced into the 1st President to reserve national Guardsmen to escort black pupils right into a white college, on the behest of a racist Democratic Arkansas Governor (because of the fact racial integration replaced into especially debatable lower back then). around the Kennedy administration, the Democrats observed that there may be skill for a great base of electorate if the Democrats have been to develop into the greater present day social gathering (by using helping equality, they might have great allure for the minority's) so as that they began helping the Civil Rights circulation. those adjustments which you have observed and choose for to learn greater approximately are called social gathering systems. They define the political schedule's and ideology of a particular political social gathering for the duration of a particular term in American history. i think of you would be shocked that virtually the two social gathering's have completed close to a hundred and eighty's over the final 60 years or so (for the duration of the 50's, the Republican social gathering replaced into supposedly the fashionable between intellectuals like college professors and instructors; in no way might've concept that immediately, precise?)

Answer 4

Lots of terrorists have already said they want Democrats to run America.

Answer 5

The Democrats appease to terrorists.

I really wish people could see how some democrats are dangerous to this Country.

Answer 6

Probably a Democrat. If you look at the past, many democrats have prefered "Detente" or the easing of tensions rather than an all out confrintation and resolution of the Cold War, where Reagan took a more proactive role in the war.

Also, if you look at the past many democrats even did not support the war of 1812 against the british calling the young republicans in Congress, "War Hawks", a term that is still used today and could be used to anyone that actually wants to win a war for America.

Answer 7

Terrorists don't care, they'll try to kill us anyway. However, they probably think their job will be easier with a Republican in the White House because of the amount of recruiting the war in Iraq does for Al Qaeda.

Answer 8

Terrorists would want Democrats in the White House, because they will not fight as long as Republicans.

Answer 9

The terrorist prefer democrats because they know that the democrats are anti-war, thus pulling troops out of Iraq which will allow them more time to focus on an attack. With our troops there we are keeping them busy and messing with their focus. Once that stops we will become their ultimate priority.

Answer 10

i think they would prefer Republicans but they don't really care, America will be America no matter who is in charge. the Republicans are the ones that created a "war" in which hundreds of thousands of Iraqis were killed, no matter how justified the killing was it can only breed more terrorists. how would you feel if your family was killed by a stray bomb, you would be angry and seek revenge in anyway you could.

what did England do with the IRA? they removed there base of support so they could no longer function, just as there was no military solution there there is none in Iraq.