I thought it was extremely hilarious!!! The only time I'd ever root for Manning's team would be when they're playing New England.
2007-11-12 10:12:48 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
kinda reminded me of the Bills/Cowboys game... except Manning was missing half of the starters on offense and the kicker missed in the end.
2007-11-12 10:16:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Payton palms down. He had the proper blend of speed, agility and means whilst he mandatory it. Jim Brown replaced into super and knew the thank you to win, yet he replaced into not blessed with the comparable actual presents as Walter Payton. There are a handful of athletes which you would be able to say at the instant are not synthetic, they are born. No quantity of prepare, practise, etc. would have created Walter Payton.
2017-01-05 09:11:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Truly great QBs are measured by the number of rings they have.
Marino vs. Montana
Which one has higher stats? Which one has more rings (or any for that matter). Brady will go down in the books in Montana like fashion simply because he was able to lead his team all the way, not padding stats on crap teams alone. Manning finally won the big one, but Brady is going to get his fourth and will always be considered better than Manning.
2007-11-12 10:25:41 · answer #3 · answered by jae w 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all you illiterate moron, PAyton is how you spell Walter's last name. PEyton is the real Manning!! 3 of Peyton's Int's weren't really his fault. Fact is, any QB playing without his starting TE, 2 starting WR's, his starting LT and then mid game his starting RT would have had just as rough a night. Bottom line, if Vinatieri wasn't still on N.E. payroll, Peyton brings his team back from 23 down to win!!!! Peyton Mayonnaise??? Not hardly my friend. Peyton THE MANing is more like it!! This guy is only 28 yards short of 40,000! Only 7 other guys in NFL history can claim that and it took all of them over 15 years to reach it. Peyton has only played 9 1/2. Also, will reach 300 TD's faster than anyone in NFL history in 2 games or less!!! Care to comment on that???
2007-11-12 10:19:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
What amazed me was the fact that 6 INTS and 2 missed F/G's (of course the second lost them the game) but all of that and they still had a shot at winning!
How bad are the 'Bolts? Most other teams in the league would have destroyed their opposition with those numbers!
2007-11-12 10:21:54 · answer #5 · answered by jeffwar03 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Man he was horrible last night, they should have won that game. Defense i great but Adam v. and Manning lost the game. They have lots of injuries but they will be ready for the playoffs. They will beat New England in the Playoffs.
2007-11-12 10:21:59 · answer #6 · answered by BB 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Vinatieri has been a different kicker since he traded in his Patriots uniform for a Colts uniform. Peyton had a bad game, but he also overcame his mistakes, kept his team in it to win and it was Vinatieri's fault.
2007-11-12 10:20:10 · answer #7 · answered by nflcowboyfan71 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
calm down, manning was without clark, harrison, and a couple offensive linemen. how good would dallas be without owens, witten, and 2 of their offensive linemen? probably not that good. truth is, colts should have won, adam missed a 29 yrder.
2007-11-12 10:20:05 · answer #8 · answered by what? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
wuts even more sad is the fact they shoulda won that game even with manning throwing 6 pics.. the sign of a good team is one that can win when they play their worse and theres no reason they shoulda lost that game other than vinatieri (p.s. i hate the colts)
2007-11-12 10:17:29 · answer #9 · answered by tmg03 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's nice to see that Peyton is, in fact, human which is contrary to what most commentators make him out to be.
2007-11-12 10:53:34 · answer #10 · answered by Growler 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋