i mean obviously its wrong to murder but we murder animals for meat, if human flesh is consummable...what is the difference?...just curious as to peoples opinions...and no im not a vegetarian...im quite a carnivore actually...;0)
2007-11-12 09:40:09 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Jacob G IV... do you consider other animals less deserving of life than us? i dont...plus which it could provide a useful use for non release and death row prisoners for terrible crime...they could kill them, cook them and serve them up for prison dinner...sounds like a good plan...
man is really the only animal that kills for pleasure...;0)
2007-11-12 09:52:24 · update #1
It's a funny one isn't it. In the natural world we seldom see it. Chimps kill and eat monkeys, but you don't see them kill and eat other chimps. No land based carnivore is famed for cannibalism is it? I know sea creatures are far less fussy, but all mammals appear to find it a taboo..
I also agree with you that humans are nothing special in the animal world, but that doesn't make us any more inclined towards eating our own, than the lion or tiger would be.
2007-11-12 11:12:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
In my honest opinion, I don't think cannibalism is wrong. The only thing is murder is in fact wrong so maybe we can get human meat when people die instead of cutting people up on the street. Personally I rather save an animals life.
2007-11-12 09:45:43 · answer #2 · answered by Vampira 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it's to do with humans eating fellow humans - that's the difference. There are a few animals who eat their own kind but it may be a case of having to.
2007-11-12 09:45:18 · answer #3 · answered by tattyhead65 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
those that have continuously had an abundance of nutrition at their disposal seem to have an surprisingly reliable worry of starving to death. Do you have any theory how long it could take an customary properly fed American to starve to death?! properly over a month!!! Fasting won't kill you and can be somewhat stable for you. as long as water is available you will no longer could desire to hotel to ingesting your fellow guy for somewhat a jointly as. And certainly you ought to discover something else to consume, even bugs.
2016-11-11 07:11:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bit of a weird question but i think its rong coz uva animals do it but humans are more intellegant and evolved so we shouldn't feel the need to eat our own when we have other things to provide us with our necessary diet... That probably dusnt make sens but i hope it answers ur question.
2007-11-12 09:49:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's a moral issue and a legal issue...other than that there is no reason not to eat human meat if you want to.
2007-11-12 09:55:14 · answer #6 · answered by Amythes 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion, if cows get mad cow disease from eating other cows, then I don't even want to know what humans could get by consuming other humans for food. It just doesn't seem healthy.
2007-11-12 09:46:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because we're too civilised. How would you feel if you went down the pub and someone said that your Uncle Bernard was quite tasty.
2007-11-12 09:46:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not much from the sustenance point of view. It's more of a moral issue, I mean, it would bring a whole new meaning to having grandma for lunch, wouldn't it?
2007-11-12 09:45:06 · answer #9 · answered by Ahwell 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Cows and chickens are lower than us on the foodchain! As the top of the chain, its are 'duty' to eat animals! If we eat each other, the animals go to waste!!!! Think of the animals! THINK OF THE ANIMALS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-11-12 09:46:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋