There are several detractors here, and I am willing to bet $ that at least 67% have : 1. Never spent a minimum of 30 days in an Islamic controled country, living AND working with the local natives, 2. Have not served in the U.S. MILITARY Forces defending this, the USA, in one of the countries, mentioned in #1 above.
Most likely, those detractors will NOT Volunteer to go to one of those countries, to learn first hand of whense we / you / I speak.
2007-11-12 21:34:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
We liberals pushed for implementing all of the recommendations of the 911 Commission, which conservatives still resist. During the Clinton administration, the Hart-Rudman Commission on National Security produced a report saying that terrorism and Osama Bin-Laden were the greatest threats to America. Condoleezza Rice told Gary Hart that she didn't even read the report until after 911. The Commission recommended the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security, which Bush resisted until after 911. See excerpts from the book "The Clinton Wars" below to see how the Republicans undercut Bill Clinton's efforts to fight terrrorism. Sorry to expose you to too much truth and reality.
2007-11-12 17:27:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dr. WD 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
So what if it's independent? That doesn't mean a single thing - they can write bad journalism even if they're independent, and they can be incredibly biased in favour of one political organisation if they're independent. Even by the adverts on that website I can see that it's a pretty hardline conservative Christian website - conservative T-shirts, ZION oil (in Israel for Israel) and pro gun adverts? Doesn't sound very inclusive of all political opinions to ME.
I don't think ANYONE is denying that there are people out there who want the west to convert to Islam or die. Just because there are SOME, that was _SOME_ for the hard of thinking, doesn't mean EVERYONE thinks that. There are SOME Christians who think homosexuals should be burnt at the stake, do ALL Christians have this incredibly intolerant view?
2007-11-12 17:13:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mordent 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
geez, does this mean that I won't be able to eat pork anymore????
Some brits might like the way that guy is chanting "death to tony blair" hehehe, personally I thought he was pretty cool and always wanted to have a beer with him.
Well, due to the way that democrats and republicans in washington are so corrupt, similiar to the philippines, I always thought we needed a revolution, never thought it would come from the muslim branch. I think the first people they'd behead when they take over is nancy "freakin immoral" pelosi and hillary "I'm a beyotch" clinton.
The UK needs to get tough on these protestors and zip them back to pakisatan where they belong.
2007-11-13 06:42:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by WhereTheBuffaloRoam 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree that those who practice Wahhabism of the Muslim faith are responsible for terrorism. However, too many Muslims in this country could get caught up in the middle of this by using the term Islamofascism. I still prefer Chicken Turds. They are only using the Muslim religion as a tool not as a real faith. This would be like using Christianfascism for the KKK, they also pretend to use the bible and Christ for their bigotted ways.
2007-11-12 17:16:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by rance42 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
As demonstrated by so many here, ignorance is all that libs are truly comfortable with and they will cling to it to their dying day which unfortunately, just might be where we are led if they regain power.
How come no one ever blames Clinton for not reacting on the reports that were generated under his own administration?
(shakes head)
2007-11-13 01:12:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by wider scope 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am even more surprised at the total apathy and ignorance at the threat of America's genocidal imperialism and the persistence of cheerleaders like you to encourage the USA to spread carnage and destruction to other parts of the world.
2007-11-12 17:34:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
"Independently owned," eh? The usual disclaimer before posting propaganda from any far-right opinion rag...
Yes, it does surprise me that people are still very ignorant about Islamofacism. But they're easy to identify, because they use the invented, meaningless nonsequitur - "islamofacism."
It's also usually used by people who support fascist policies by our own government...
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised at what the painfully ignorant do, but the degree to which that ignorance runs can still shock my jaded sensibilities, at times.
2007-11-12 17:22:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Not asking God to bless the troops anymore, huh? Nice, expecially on Veteran's Day...
What surprises me is you seem SO knowledgable about this subject, yet will do NOTHING but bring this frightening news to a few hundred (maybe a few thousand) people's attention on Yahoo Answers. And that's it.
Why don't you HELP this country you claim to love so much, take THIS day and MAKE it the day you enlist in the US Armed Forces and make it not only a day to make Veterans such as myself proud, but use it to make YOURSELF proud as well. and join.
Quit shorting our troops and bring your vast experience in "Islamofascism" and your deeply penetrating knowledge of those "fascists" to their defense, so fewer of them have to die before Gulf sews up those oil contracts.
2007-11-12 17:17:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
Don't make up words. That's psychological disorder. There is a danger from Islamic Theocrats, who are right-leaning like Fascists and Neocons, but unlike the 2nd two groups, Islamic Theocrats have no interest in tying up government and corporate interests with no-bid contracts and anti-capitalistic monopolies.
2007-11-12 17:12:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋