Once and for all cons. Are all the well established scientific organizations that support man made GW?

Question

supporting the theory because:

A) They are all socialists who are purposely lying in order to destroy capitalism.

or

B) They are all capitalists who are purposely lying in order to get global warming money.

Which tin foil hat conspiracy theory do you support cons?

People who have seen me post, have already seen me post a long list of scientific organizations complete with quotes directly from their official websites.

I'm talking about the American Chemical Society, the American Meteorological Society, the Geological Society of America, NASA GISS, the National Academy of Science, etc, etc.

Answer 1

"Global warming is real"
-George W. Bush-

People when even GWB says global warming is real maybe you should pay attention.

Answer 2

If we didn't waste so much money on all the useless crap that these GW knuckleheads, be they capitalists or socialists, whine about, we could be eating ice cream and cake every night and still have plenty of dough left over to give every man, woman and child and their pets and all the 30+ million illegal aliens a B12 shot in the butt every morning for the next millennium.
So choose, ice cream and cake and a daily B12 shot or some Chicken Little the sky is falling story?
As for me I'll take Vanilla and some Strawberry Shortcake thank you very much.

Answer 3

They are people who make money by claiming catastrophes are on their way. They are the same type of people that warned we'd all be killed by global cooling, the hole in the ozone layer, acid rain, and starvation due to the population explosion.

Scientists that disagree with the "consensus" are invariably dismissed and threatened because Global Warming has become big business.

Global warming is a tin hat conspiracy theory.

Answer 4

I'm certain you haven't analyzed the information on Earth's temperature changes first hand. My point is we believe what others tell us sometimes. The people who want us to believe in man-made global warming are the ones who are giving us the information that the scientists are supposedly creating. When there are hundreds of factors that can contribute to an effect, causation is very hard to prove, unless of course you already believe what you want to begin with. Did you know that every planet in our solar system is also warming? This is likely due to the Sun's activity. What did I do to increase the temperature on Uranus? I'm not saying that man-made global warming isn't happening, but I've got good reason to be skeptical about what they're feeding us.

Answer 5

And there is an equally long list of scientists and scientific organizations who dispute the chicken little global warming theories espoused by those who you support.

But we are willing to enter into scientific debate about it. You are unwilling to hear any opposition to your (near-religious) beliefs about man-made global warming.

Increasingly, as more and better data is collected, it undermines, rather than supports, the global warming theory you espouse.

And unlike you, I don't sink to the level of questioning their motives or character. That's strictly for losers and asshats ... evidently.

As someone schooled in the sciences, I question their conclusions and question the assumptions that led to their conclusions. And there are thousands of scientists who say the same thing.
-----------
Hey, babylonia, you got something to say to me? I'm not a craven coward - I let people e-mail me.

I know a helluva lot more about science and the scientific method than you do. And more about the Constitution, too.

Answer 6

there's an incredible style of revealed technological information in respected scientific journals refuting guy-made worldwide warming. i particularly am a scientist and that i think of the technological information is vulnerable. the final public of scientists as quickly as believed the earth replaced into flat, and replaced into the centre of the universe.

Answer 7

C) This is what happens when a NASA scientist, Dr. James E. Hansen, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, questions the religion of global warming. They don't refute what he says, they merely excoriate him as a blasphemer.

Answer 8

Try googling some of these so called "established" organizations. I think you'll find some haven't even been around for that long. Of course they want government money for their research, how can you say it's a conspiracy theory? What you don't have is proof, neither do they. You keep drinking the kool aid and the rest of us with brains will enjoy the weather.

Answer 9

Hehe you make a very good point. Just another to add to the long list of global warming denier contradictions.

Is global warming not happening, or is it happening naturally? Are humans not responsible, or are we responsible but the consequences are going to be negligible? Are scientists all in on a conspiracy, or are some scientists (and apparently TV weathermen) trustworthy?

Is it an attempt to establish One World Order, destroy capitalism, or make a bunch of money even though scientists don't work for profit?

Global warming denial arguments are remarkably inconsistent and contradictory, aren't they?

Answer 10

Do these scientists not also say Mars is getting warmer? Will Gore start a carbon offset company so we can save Mars?

Answer 11

They all give us theories, just theories. No one has been able to prove conclusively that little 'ol man is the sole(or even the main) cause of GW. There have been cycles of warming and cooling for eons...before man appeared even.