For example on the Night of Long Knives would her "camp" have been right at home eliminating threats?? lol
2007-11-12 07:59:29 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Le Andra...fur sure gurl...lol
2007-11-12 08:18:03 · update #1
I knew no dem who answers could resist mentioning Bush...lol...it's pretty funny
2007-11-12 08:20:02 · update #2
And yes Jake you r right...I dropped out of school after my 2nd grad degree...read it and weep baby...lol
2007-11-12 08:22:00 · update #3
LOL I totally agree.
2007-11-12 08:02:21 · answer #1 · answered by LeAndra 4 · 1⤊ 6⤋
The only administration to demonstrably take away elements of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution the last 45 years is the current Bush administration.
2007-11-12 16:17:00 · answer #2 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sir Edmund Hillary would have been more of an asset to Hitler, given the latter's proximity to the Alps.
2007-11-12 16:46:45 · answer #3 · answered by yutsnark 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stalin would have her "bumped" as he would have quicly realized that as a Domme she'd take over. Hitler was far to shrewd for Hillary's clumbsy tactics. Ole "dolf" would have appointed her as a minor official in the SS before having her promoted to commadant, KZ Buchenwald! She'd shined in that role as "lord over the helpless"!
2007-11-12 16:27:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. She would have been an asset to Roosevelt. Regardless of anything, I think she is an American patriot who in the long run would put her country first.
2007-11-12 16:30:56 · answer #5 · answered by Robert S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they would prefer one of the Republicans who would torture people for them. Hillary is too much of a wimp to really fit in.
2007-11-12 16:40:50 · answer #6 · answered by meg 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't understand the point of the Hillary bashing
2007-11-12 16:36:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler would have checked to see if she/he was circumcised before doing business with her.
Stalin killed all possible rivals.
So I'd have to go with Hitler on this one
2007-11-12 16:10:32 · answer #8 · answered by Johnny 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For George W Bush. They would have made a great partnership.
2007-11-12 16:03:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The one that required the best Liar.
2007-11-12 16:32:35 · answer #10 · answered by Johnny Reb 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She would have fit in perfectly with either camp and no doubt turned in her neighbors and then served on the firing squad to prove her loyalty.
Her only problem here would have been her own all consuming quest for ultimate POWER would have caused her to wind up in the sweep one of those times as being to ambitious in those regimes was a fatal flaw.
2007-11-12 16:06:34 · answer #11 · answered by CFB 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋