2007-11-12 07:02:36 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ron Paul cannot win the Republican nomination, but if this happens, I'll vote for Ron Paul.
2007-11-12 07:13:12 · answer #1 · answered by RICARDVS VII 3 · 2⤊ 6⤋
Senator Hillary Clinton
2007-11-12 07:14:21 · answer #2 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
If those were the only choices, then I'd be researching information on how to immigrate to the Netherlands.
Clinton is a corporate-sponsored candidate, just like the other Democratic and Republican front-runners: as such, she supports the same kind of rabid, unrestrained free market capitalism that is the cornerstone of right-wing ideology. She does not, in any way, represent real change. Likewise, Paul, as a libertarian, would completely eliminate the social net for the poor and eliminate what few regulations the U.S. has to counter exploitation of the environment and of workers by the corporate industrial machine. His ideology is extremist by definition and would result in workers being subjected to conditions that are comparable to slavery.
Both should be opposed at all costs.
2007-11-12 08:21:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's easy. Definently Ron Paul because Clinton thinks that it takes a village to raise a child, while Ron Paul actually follows the constitution and believes in the spirit of individualism and self reliance which has made this nation prosper.
2007-11-12 07:35:31 · answer #4 · answered by BP 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This question really does point to the pathetic state of politics in America. To answer honestly, I'd vote for Ron Paul, because I like his smaller government positions.
Hillary hasn't ever done anything. She's never lead anything. She's never managed anything. Name one Senate Bill that she's created?
She did have an earmark on a recent bill to provide $1 Miiillion for a museum at the site of Woodstock. This is a total joke, since Alan Gerry, who owns that property, is a Clinton donor, and his net worth is $1.3 Biiillion. So how can we trust Hillary? She wants to spend our money instead of this guys?
When will any politician stand up against the Pork? The Democrats ran on an agenda last year to end the "culture of corruption", but they've done nothing, nada, zero to stop it.
2007-11-12 07:24:18 · answer #5 · answered by Trogdor 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hillary
2007-11-12 07:21:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I'd vote for Ron Paul, then get out of the voting booth before the nausea gets too bad. I hope I can make it to the street.
2007-11-12 12:36:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul
2007-11-12 07:12:23 · answer #8 · answered by cynical 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Ron Paul
2007-11-12 07:07:53 · answer #9 · answered by Boss H 7 · 3⤊ 6⤋
If your an American and love your nation you can not vote for Hillary so Ron Paul.
2007-11-12 07:17:52 · answer #10 · answered by satcomgrunt 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Ron Paul... but this is only a hypothetical because Ron Paul doesn't have a chance to be the Republican nominee... sorry, but he won't be elected in the primary.
Primaries are for the base... not the fringes or the progressives.
2007-11-12 07:13:52 · answer #11 · answered by cattledog 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋