Machiavelli seems quite cynical about the role of religion in politics. Like moses bringing the ten commandments, or Numa and roman religion, there is nothing divine about religion. Rather, the role of reltigion is meant to educate citizens into civic virtue. Yet despite this cynicism, machiavelli refers to fortuna as a goddness. Is machiavelli oing nothing more than founding a new religion? is there something different about fortuna?
I need a thesis statement to this questionn, in reference from the book machiavelliii asappppppppppppppppp, helppp if youuu cannn, as well as any detailss that can back up the thesisss, ahhhh tnank youuu =)
2007-11-12 06:41:43 · 2 answers · asked by Babyjulzz 1 in Social Science ➔ Sociology
Using the word goddness definitely sounds like a new religion to me, nothing different there than what other people have done, I am definitely a fan of the ten commandments though, they give us standards we need to keep ourselves in touch with God.
2007-11-14 06:17:32 · answer #1 · answered by victor 7707 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
once you're partial to politics, then you definitely'll little question do very nicely with a poly sci substantial (and in all probability regulation college). it is recommended to contemplate a summer season internship for the duration of your college years in some form of governmental provider and/or volunteering for a political campaign. this might grant you with own adventure that should grant you a greater helpful awareness of what the real international of government involves. good luck on your learn.
2016-10-16 06:37:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋