English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

Nope...had nothing to do with the meds....I truely WAS against her and her husband.....

2007-11-12 06:05:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

She was sober. She also said....

"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" 6/29/2004


"It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few...and to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity." 5/29/2007


"(We)...can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people." 6/4/2007

"I certainly think the free-market has failed." 6/4/2007

I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched." 9/2/2005

"We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own...in order to create this common ground." 6/4/2007


"Fairness doesn't just happen. It requires the right government policies."

"it's time to replace an "on your own" society with one based on shared responsibility and prosperity."

2007-11-12 13:42:37 · answer #2 · answered by Early Cuyler 2 · 3 0

Anything, ANYTHING Hillary says, she says for one reason and one reason only...it tested well with focus groups.

And anyone who believes the nonsense about how the investigations of the Clinton Administration did not yield much results, take a moment and find out how many people being investigated turned up dead or refused to testify. Note how Hillary's billing records suddenly turned up in the living quarters of the White House and of course how the President was accused of rape but never publicly denied the charges.

You see, Juanita Brodrick accused him of rape. If it was not true he could have sued her for slander. If it was true and he denied it publicly she could sue him and bring her evidence to court. What did Bill do? Well he sent his lawyer out to make a carefully crafted non-denial denial. His lawyer cleverly made a statement that back in 1972 the president did not rape Miss Brodrick. Then he would not answer any other questions about it.

You see, Bill Clinton was not president in 1972. So what this carefully crafted statement was saying was that Jimmy Carter never raped Juanita Brodrick. You decide. All I know is, if some woman publicly accused me of raping her I would publicly deny it myself in no uncertain terms. If she kept it up I would bring her to court and make her show cause.

.

2007-11-12 14:58:29 · answer #3 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 0 1

No, Son, When Hillary made that statement(and so many like it), she was ON her meds. The day's she is OFF the meds are the days she cuss's her secret service protectors !!!
On the days she's OFF the meds, her staff keeps her ISOLATED, so no one, except them, know what she is really like !!!
Imagine Hillary as President on the days Off meds, and something REALLY IMPORTANT HAPPENS!
SCARRY????

2007-11-12 15:25:19 · answer #4 · answered by I'M HERE 4 · 1 2

I saw that interview with Katie Couric on the Today Show.

It connects to Newt's attempted Coup (contract with America)

Maybe not as vast as either Newt or Hillary imagined; but no doubt real on some levels.

2007-11-12 13:36:01 · answer #5 · answered by Guerilla Liberal fighter 3 · 4 3

What information do you have that Hillary is on meds. None I assume. But the fact remains she was correct. Read that pud Mike Reagan's column on Hillary. If ever there is a document that is evidence to her contention, this pud wrote it.

2007-11-12 13:44:32 · answer #6 · answered by kenny J 6 · 1 3

I didn't know they ever let Hillary off her meds!

2007-11-12 13:39:49 · answer #7 · answered by 2nd AD/ 4th ID 5 · 2 1

Not off her meds, instead ON yahoo answers perhaps.

2007-11-12 13:37:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

All libs are off their meds. That's for sure.
I Cr 13;8a

2007-11-13 04:24:31 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 1 0

Uh, there WAS a right wing conspriacy against her and her husband.

Kenneth Starr searched and searched and searched for something to pin on them, and failed, and so have to use sex scandels to try to bring him down.

Even that didn't work.

2007-11-12 18:02:05 · answer #10 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers