Maybe. Nothing more detestable than benefitting from capitalism and pushing communism.
And what kind of US company has speech guidelines which disfavor freedom of speech?
2007-11-12 04:40:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 7
·
7⤊
2⤋
No, I would prefer to see all of YAHOO.COM exec's having to answer to all of their customers who are paying BIG BUCKS because of the inflated number of accounts.
HEY, EVERY one, every advertiser you see on Yahoo.com , OR Yahoo!Answers, send them an e-mail telling how y/a has suspended many, many accounts, and that people have to establish a new account to keep going, BUT y/a NEVER ADJUSTS THE NUMBERS, DOWN, Y/A JUST KEEPS ADDING !!!! There are NO " - " BUTTONS AT THE Y/A ACCOUNTING OFFICE !!!!!!!!!
I HAVE SENT SOME E-MAILS OFF, STATING MY FIVE (5) SUSPENSIONS, PLUS THIS ONE MAKES SIX (6) THOSE ADVERTISERS ARE PAYING FOR !!!
Do you have the 'guts / cojones / balz / huevos' to do what we others have started AND DONE????????
2007-11-12 07:45:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
this is an exceedingly mean and immature question!! Why could you ask a question thats particular to break someones emotions? As for Leogirl, there is not any longer something in any respect incorrect together with her so Enlighten you could prefer to be enlightened that in basic terms reason someones perspectives do no longer tournament yours isn't a reason to place them down.
2016-11-11 06:28:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Top idea but lets go into more detail, especially on which executives and the custumes they should wear, their positions, etc.
Funny how a company dedicated to, and made rich by, the free exchange of opinions now sees its future in a country dedicated to supression of same!
2007-11-12 04:45:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'm so glad to hear that other people feel this way. I have always wanted to call YAHOO out in how BOGUS they are on here.
They post questions in favor of mainstream media ideas, and definitely have money on their minds it seems.
I think it's really funny, because I swear to god I've seen them post in Ron Paul questions, and they sounded like the FBI.
I'll see two similar looking posts, that are short, REALLY negative, and basically try and persuade people to, "Stick to the REAL candidates"
2007-11-12 05:02:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by AckDuScheisse!! 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Maybe them instead of Brian. However, I think he was just protesting . The other day was BeachBum as #1 in Politics and now it is Brian.
2007-11-12 09:58:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Michael M 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would prefer never to even think about Yahoo! execs.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-11-12 19:40:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Seems a con-troll plot to asissynate yahoo answers and,
make it a rabies mirror for Nazi-Ann and Viagrush, failed
- if I interprete the collapse of world tissue trade correctly.
2007-11-12 04:48:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
behinde bars
2007-11-12 04:50:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by allison b 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Mr. Yang, the CEO can lead them.
2007-11-12 04:54:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋