2007-11-12 04:28:13 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Why should they, if Pakistan is serving the very purpose they have?Pakistan is the only recognized state which sponsors terrorism as a state policy and shall continue to do so for years to come.If Bush or Americans think Pakistan shall help them in fighting terrorism,then they have no clue about the inside governmental functioning and mind set of thousands of religious out fits working and operating from there.It's like a well established industry on which millions are dependent for their livelihood and religious sustenance.ISI,the main intelligence organization of Pakistan mostly operates at it's own and even has it's own secret source of funding and has negligible governmental control over it.Unfortunately,not many countries/ people(particularly in the west),know about this hidden face of Pakistan.America shall keep getting piece meal token of help from Pakistan as long as Dollars keep flowing in and a dictator is safely in power.
2007-11-13 02:55:04 · answer #1 · answered by brkshandilya 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Al Qaeda couldn't take over an ant farm. They hit and run; if there's anything left of them. Even the main lunatic Bin Laden is a millionaire who can't leave his cave. Not much of a plan.
2007-11-12 12:38:07 · answer #2 · answered by Bob H 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I feel this is propaganda to make the rest of the world think they are on the comeback, they are not. The "World Community" need to step up and say enough is enough, and put these a**holes to rest. I am sick of the neutral sociaties sitting back and saying " we will see how it goes". The threat will soon come to their doorstep someday and then what will they say? " HELP!"
2007-11-12 12:41:10 · answer #3 · answered by schneider2294@sbcglobal.net 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That is what worries America. Hence the state of emergency called by their puppet leader.
2007-11-12 12:34:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
maybe but if they do US will kick their towels off their head!!! lol
2007-11-12 12:31:44 · answer #5 · answered by 9ball 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, not yet at least
2007-11-12 12:30:54 · answer #6 · answered by GSH 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-11-12 12:30:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anz 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no, bush is
2007-11-12 12:35:10 · answer #8 · answered by Matt P 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋