No. It should be a period. It would be better for dramatic effect anyway. I would also think that the comma after him is incorrect.
2007-11-12 04:23:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Marc D 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes, that's correct. The best way to judge it is that if a period would be acceptable at that point, a semicolon is also acceptable. In other words, the phrases before and after the semicolon should both be complete thoughts.
However, In this particular case, it might be better to use a period and make it two separate sentences. Semicolons are usually used to join shorter and simpler sentences. Many English teachers would call your example a run-on sentence.
2007-11-12 04:29:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by ConcernedCitizen 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes that is the correct usage for a semi-colon. A Semi colon seperates two seperate complete sentences that rely on one another to give a full and complete understanding of a particular idea. Those two sentences would qualify to be seperated by a semi-colon.
2007-11-12 04:25:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Phill Lee 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Don't need the comma after him. Also, I would just get rid of the semi-colon and make it a new sentence. Trying to throw too many things into the one sentence.
2007-11-12 04:24:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by pa 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes
2007-11-12 04:28:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes
2007-11-12 04:24:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Yesenia 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes
2007-11-12 04:22:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Poetic1 1
·
2⤊
2⤋
No the semicolon is not needed. Replace it will a period. You are trying to put 2 seperate thoughts/ statements together when it is not necessary.
2007-11-12 04:24:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Melanie B 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Correct
2007-11-12 04:23:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dan 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
This should be re-phrased for clarity. Who is the friend, John or another person? One assumes "he" is Jack.
2007-11-12 04:29:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by SAD 2
·
0⤊
1⤋